Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@MehmedGIT
Copy link
Contributor

This draft PR is supposed to get important aspects from #884 and adapt to #974 so it can extend the ocrd_network package to provide the standalone Processor Server feature.

I am creating this a bit early so it's easy to follow what is going on with this. Still broken and fixes are needed. A lot more refactoring is needed to follow afterward.

joschrew and others added 30 commits December 7, 2022 16:25
We decided to use only single quotes for strings to make it consistent.
I kept docstrings in triple double quotes because of PEP 257.
They were added to give additional information but are not needed here
any more in this place
@MehmedGIT MehmedGIT requested review from bertsky, joschrew, kba and tdoan2010 and removed request for bertsky, joschrew, kba and tdoan2010 March 28, 2023 23:27
@bertsky
Copy link
Collaborator

bertsky commented Mar 28, 2023

Excellent! For a proper review, it would help to see the actual diff over dev-processing-broker. I think it would make more sense to start a new PR against that branch (even if it's going to be merged independently). After reviewing and working on the branch, you could still open a PR against master.

@MehmedGIT
Copy link
Contributor Author

MehmedGIT commented Mar 29, 2023

Excellent! For a proper review, it would help to see the actual diff over dev-processing-broker. I think it would make more sense to start a new PR against that branch (even if it's going to be merged independently). After reviewing and working on the branch, you could still open a PR against master.

I just wanted to assign reviewers but it also automatically requests a review. This is still far away from being reviewed... You're right. I am going to create a PR to #974. Check #1030.

@MehmedGIT MehmedGIT closed this Mar 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants