backend/apps/mentorship/management/commands/mentorship_update_comments.py (2)

46-50: Use .exists() instead of .count() for existence checks.

When only checking if a queryset has any results, .exists() is more efficient than .count() as it uses SELECT 1 ... LIMIT 1 instead of SELECT COUNT(*).

🔎 Proposed refactor

-        if modules_without_labels.count():
-            for module in modules_without_labels:
-                self.stdout.write(
-                    self.style.WARNING(f"Skipping. Module '{module.name}' has no labels.")
-                )
+        for module in modules_without_labels:
+            self.stdout.write(
+                self.style.WARNING(f"Skipping. Module '{module.name}' has no labels.")
+            )

Note: If the queryset is empty, the loop simply won't execute, making the if check redundant.

---

52-56: Use .exists() for better performance.

Similar to the previous check, use .exists() instead of .count() == 0 for more efficient database queries.

🔎 Proposed refactor

-        if modules_with_labels.count() == 0:
+        if not modules_with_labels.exists():
             self.stdout.write(
                 self.style.WARNING("No published mentorship modules with labels found. Exiting.")
             )
             return

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Learnt from: Rajgupta36
Repo: OWASP/Nest PR: 2000
File: backend/apps/mentorship/management/commands/sync_module_issues.py:109-145
Timestamp: 2025-08-17T11:55:55.990Z
Learning: In the OWASP/Nest mentorship system, tasks are designed to be assigned to only one assignee per issue, even if GitHub issues can have multiple assignees. The sync_module_issues command correctly uses issue.assignees.first() to create one task per issue for the first assignee only.

Learnt from: rudransh-shrivastava
Repo: OWASP/Nest PR: 2948
File: backend/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_generate_community_snapshot_video.py:40-40
Timestamp: 2025-12-18T05:39:42.678Z
Learning: In Django management commands, prefer using self.stdout.write(...) over print(...) for user-facing stdout output. This aligns with Django conventions and improves testability. When emitting messages, consider using self.stdout.write and, for styled messages, use self.style.SUCCESS/ERROR as appropriate to maintain consistent command output formatting. Apply this guideline to all Python files within any project's management/commands directory.

backend/apps/mentorship/management/commands/mentorship_update_comments.py (1)

46-50: Consider logging a count instead of iterating for improved efficiency.

While the current approach provides detailed visibility, iterating through all unlabeled modules just to log warnings could produce verbose output if many such modules exist. Consider logging a single message with the count of skipped modules instead.

🔎 Proposed refactor

 if modules_without_labels.exists():
-    for module in modules_without_labels:
-        self.stdout.write(
-            self.style.WARNING(f"Skipping. Module '{module.name}' has no labels.")
-        )
+    count = modules_without_labels.count()
+    self.stdout.write(
+        self.style.WARNING(f"Skipping {count} module(s) with no labels.")
+    )

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Learnt from: rudransh-shrivastava
Repo: OWASP/Nest PR: 2948
File: backend/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_generate_community_snapshot_video.py:40-40
Timestamp: 2025-12-18T05:39:42.678Z
Learning: In Django management commands, prefer using self.stdout.write(...) over print(...) for user-facing stdout output. This aligns with Django conventions and improves testability. When emitting messages, consider using self.stdout.write and, for styled messages, use self.style.SUCCESS/ERROR as appropriate to maintain consistent command output formatting. Apply this guideline to all Python files within any project's management/commands directory.