Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@rinkitadhana
Copy link
Contributor

@rinkitadhana rinkitadhana commented Mar 20, 2025

Fixes #4007

Description:

This PR removes all email domain restrictions for new organization registration. Now, users with any valid email can register for an organization and access all organization-related paths without email domain based limitations.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Streamlined the login process by removing restrictions on email domains.
    • Updated error messages now provide general guidance for accessing your organization.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 20, 2025

Walkthrough

This change removes the logic enforcing domain-specific email restrictions from the organization login flow. The restricted email domain list and the email domain extraction function have been eliminated. Additionally, the error messages in the organization view have been updated to a more general prompt, streamlining the authentication process.

Changes

File Change Summary
website/views/company.py Removed the restricted_domain list and get_email_domain function; eliminated domain-checking logic in the Organization_view and its post method; updated error messages.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant OV as Organization_view
    U->>OV: Submit login/organization creation request
    alt Old Flow
        OV->>OV: Extract email domain using get_email_domain()
        OV->>OV: Check if domain is in restricted_domain list
        OV-->>U: Return specific error message if domain is restricted
    else New Flow
        OV->>OV: Process login without domain extraction/checks
        OV-->>U: Return generalized error message when access conditions aren’t met
    end
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Allow organization creation with any email domain (#4007) βœ…

Suggested Reviewers

  • DonnieBLT
✨ Finishing Touches
  • πŸ“ Generate Docstrings

πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

πŸ”­ Outside diff range comments (1)
website/views/company.py (1)

657-661: πŸ’‘ Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Consider updating domain validation for consistency

While the PR objective is to remove email restrictions for organization creation, this validation still enforces domain-specific email requirements when adding domains to an organization. For complete consistency with the PR's goal, consider whether this validation should also be removed.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for other domain restrictions in the codebase
grep -r "email.*domain" --include="*.py" .

Length of output: 3145


Action Required: Update Domain Validation for Consistency with PR Objectives

The PR aims to remove email restrictions for organization creation, yet the validation in website/views/company.py (lines 657–661) still forces users to have matching email domains when adding a domain. Note that similar domain-related checks are present elsewhere in the repository (e.g., repeated in this file and indirectly via website/utils.py). To fully align with the PR goal, please consider either removing or conditionally bypassing these validations when organization-level email restrictions are intended to be lifted.

  • Location: website/views/company.py (lines 657–661)
  • Suggestion: Reevaluate the need for the domain validation in this context and update or remove the conditional check accordingly.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
website/views/company.py (1)

663-670: Manager email domain validation may need similar treatment

Similar to the domain validation above, this code block still enforces domain-specific email requirements for managers. Consider whether this validation should also be removed for consistency with the PR's objective of eliminating email domain restrictions.

πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 91b2703 and fc0f6f5.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
  • website/views/company.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Run Tests
  • GitHub Check: docker-test
πŸ”‡ Additional comments (1)
website/views/company.py (1)

85-85: Improved error message for anonymous users

The error message has been updated to be more generic, aligning with the PR objective of removing email domain restrictions. This change is part of a broader update to eliminate domain-specific email validation when users try to access their organization.

@DonnieBLT DonnieBLT merged commit 0c6df56 into OWASP-BLT:main Mar 20, 2025
10 checks passed
@rinkitadhana rinkitadhana deleted the fix/removed-email-restriction branch March 20, 2025 01:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

User without a business email can't make a new organization.

2 participants