introducing proposal.md for detail funding requirement
#4224
Conversation
WalkthroughA new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant WebApp
participant JSONFixture
participant Template
User->>WebApp: Request BLT Tomato project list
WebApp->>JSONFixture: Load project data
WebApp->>WebApp: Normalize and sort by proposal_url
WebApp->>Template: Render project list with proposal_url
Template->>User: Display projects with "Show Proposal" button if proposal_url exists
Assessment against linked issues
Tip ⚡️ Faster reviews with caching
Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
website/fixtures/blt_tomato_project_link.json (1)
14-15: Remove extra empty lineThere's an unnecessary empty line after the proposal_url field for this project entry.
"funding_details": "https://owasp.org/donate/?reponame=www-project-vulnerable-web-applications-directory&title=OWASP+Vulnerable+Web+Applications+Directory", "proposal_url":"" -PROPOSAL.md (1)
8-8: Minor grammar correction neededThere's a missing article "the" before "existing codebase".
- - Responsible for developing new features and maintaining existing codebase. + - Responsible for developing new features and maintaining the existing codebase.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~8-~8: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...developing new features and maintaining existing codebase. - Marketer: $120,000 - ...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
PROPOSAL.md(1 hunks)website/fixtures/blt_tomato_project_link.json(1 hunks)website/templates/blt_tomato.html(1 hunks)website/views/project.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
PROPOSAL.md
[uncategorized] ~8-~8: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...developing new features and maintaining existing codebase. - Marketer: $120,000 - ...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run Tests
- GitHub Check: docker-test
🔇 Additional comments (5)
website/templates/blt_tomato.html (1)
58-67: Well-implemented proposal button UI additionThe conditional block for displaying the "Show Proposal" button is properly implemented and follows the existing design patterns. The button has consistent styling with the "Support Project" button and correctly opens the proposal in a new tab.
website/fixtures/blt_tomato_project_link.json (1)
7-7: Consistent addition of proposal_url field across projectsThe proposal_url field has been properly added to all project entries, with the BLT project pointing to the new PROPOSAL.md file and others having empty strings.
Also applies to: 14-15, 22-22, 29-29, 36-36, 43-43, 50-50, 57-57, 64-64, 71-71, 78-78, 85-85, 92-92, 99-99, 106-106, 113-113, 120-120, 127-127, 134-134, 141-141
PROPOSAL.md (1)
1-26: Well-structured funding proposalThe funding proposal clearly outlines the financial requirements, intended use of funds, and expected outcomes for the OWASP BLT project. The document is concise yet comprehensive.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~8-~8: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...developing new features and maintaining existing codebase. - Marketer: $120,000 - ...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
website/views/project.py (2)
80-84: Proper handling of proposal URLsThe implementation correctly extracts and normalizes the proposal_url from each project, handling empty strings and "#" values appropriately by converting them to None. This ensures consistent behavior in the template rendering.
93-93: Effective sorting implementationThe sorting logic ensures that projects with proposal URLs appear first in the list, which aligns with the PR objective to prioritize projects with proposals. The lambda function approach is clean and efficient.
fb41365
|
@DonnieBLT, let me know if any changes are needed in the proposal. Thank you! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
PROPOSAL.md (6)
1-2: Add document metadata or Table of Contents
To improve navigability, consider adding metadata at the top (e.g., date, version) or a Table of Contents linking to each section. This helps readers quickly jump to relevant parts of the proposal.
3-5: Include an Executive Summary
Right before the Introduction, add a brief Executive Summary that highlights the funding ask and key outcomes in 2–3 sentences. It provides quick context for decision-makers and sets the stage for the detailed sections.
9-11: Refine wording for formal tone
To strengthen formality, consider replacing “official GSoC slots” and “officially accepted” with “formally awarded GSoC slots” and “formally accepted.”🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~11-~11: Consider using “formally” to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...* with the same stipend amount as those officially accepted into GSoC. ### Intern Funding...(OFFICIALLY_FORMALLY)
13-15: Use a table for funding breakdown
The bullet “6 Interns x $3,000 = $18,000” could be more readable as a Markdown table alongside the confirmed slots. For example:
Category Count Stipend Total Formally awarded 4 $3,000 $12,000 Additional interns 6 $3,000 $18,000 This enhances clarity.
23-28: Structure “Use of Funds” with subheadings
Group related items under subheadings such as Community Engagement (Hackathons, Marketing and Outreach) and Project Operations (Improve UX/UI, Operational Costs). This makes the allocation clearer to stakeholders.
30-38: Add a Conclusion or Call to Action
After the Expected Outcomes, include a short Conclusion or Call to Action section that reiterates the total funding requested and next steps (e.g., review timeline, contact info). This leaves a clear directive for reviewers.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
PROPOSAL.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
PROPOSAL.md
[style] ~11-~11: Consider using “formally” to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...* with the same stipend amount as those officially accepted into GSoC. ### Intern Funding...
(OFFICIALLY_FORMALLY)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run Tests
- GitHub Check: docker-test
🔇 Additional comments (1)
PROPOSAL.md (1)
1-39: Overall, the proposal is comprehensive and well-structured.
It clearly outlines the ask, use of funds, and expected impacts. With the above refinements for readability and formality, it will be ready for presentation to sponsors.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~11-~11: Consider using “formally” to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...* with the same stipend amount as those officially accepted into GSoC. ### Intern Funding...(OFFICIALLY_FORMALLY)
close #3414
Summary by CodeRabbit