Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented May 22, 2025

Issue

The "Add Files Changed Label" workflow was failing with permission errors when trying to add labels to PRs from external repositories (forks). This would result in the following error:

Resource not accessible by integration

Solution

Modified the workflow to detect when a PR is coming from an external repository (fork) and gracefully skip the label operations in that case:

  1. Added environment variables to track source repositories:

    • PR_HEAD_REPO: The repository where the PR changes are coming from
    • BASE_REPO: The repository where the workflow is running
  2. Added a conditional check at the beginning of the workflow script:

    # Check if PR is from a fork (external repository)
    if [[ "$PR_HEAD_REPO" != "$BASE_REPO" ]]; then
      echo "This PR is from an external repository: $PR_HEAD_REPO"
      echo "Skipping label operations for external repository PR to avoid permission issues."
      exit 0
    fi
  3. This allows the workflow to:

    • Proceed normally for PRs from the same repository
    • Skip label operations for PRs from forks with a clear log message
    • Exit gracefully with code 0 to prevent workflow failures

Benefits

  • No more permission errors in the workflow logs
  • Clear messaging about why labels aren't applied for external PRs
  • Workflow completes successfully in all cases

Fixes #4313.


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 22, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Join our Discord community for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Please fix this workflow file Fix PR label workflow for external repository contributions May 22, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from DonnieBLT May 22, 2025 14:14
@DonnieBLT DonnieBLT marked this pull request as ready for review June 3, 2025 15:03
@DonnieBLT DonnieBLT enabled auto-merge June 3, 2025 15:03
@DonnieBLT DonnieBLT disabled auto-merge June 4, 2025 16:39
@DonnieBLT DonnieBLT merged commit c3644ee into main Jun 4, 2025
1 check passed
@DonnieBLT DonnieBLT deleted the copilot/fix-4313 branch June 4, 2025 16:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

files-changed: 0 PR changes 0 files

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Please fix this workflow file

2 participants