website/templates/slack.html (1)

282-312: Consider documenting list/cancel subcommands for reminders and huddles

The new command docs for /blt_poll, /blt_remind, and /blt_huddle look accurate for the basic create flows. Given that the implementation also supports listing and cancelling reminders/huddles, you might optionally add a brief note or extra examples for those subcommands so this page reflects the full feature set.

website/tests/test_slack.py (1)

318-603: Slash command tests cover main happy paths and help flows well

The new tests around /blt_poll, /blt_remind, and /blt_huddle exercise both help (no‑text) and standard creation paths, and validate the resulting database state (questions/options, reminder status/target, huddle fields and participants, activity logging). The request construction is consistent with existing Slack command tests and should give good regression protection.

If you want to tighten them further later, you could factor out the repeated Slack user/mocking setup into small helpers and add one or two negative‑case tests (e.g., too few poll options, invalid time syntax), but that’s optional.

website/admin.py (1)

1001-1006: Default admin registration is sufficient for initial Slack features

Registering the SlackPoll/Option/Vote, SlackReminder, SlackHuddle, and SlackHuddleParticipant models with the default admin is a good starting point. If usage grows, you might later add list filters (e.g., by status/workspace) for easier operations, but nothing is required now.

website/management/commands/process_slack_reminders_and_huddles.py (2)

123-125: Querying workspace_name with a workspace ID appears intentional but is confusing.

The field name workspace_name is used to store the Slack team/workspace ID (not the human-readable name). This matches existing patterns in slack_handlers.py but the naming is misleading. Consider renaming the field in a future migration for clarity.

---

215-221: Redundant dry_run check inside the non-dry-run branch.

Line 218 checks not options["dry_run"], but this code is already inside the else block (line 215) that only executes when dry_run is False. The condition is always true and can be simplified.

                     else:
                         ok_count = 0
                         ws_token = self._token_for_workspace(huddle.workspace_id, token)
-                        if not ws_token and not options["dry_run"]:
+                        if not ws_token:
                             huddle.reminder_sent = True  # avoid infinite loop; no token to send
                             huddle.save(update_fields=["reminder_sent"])
                             continue

website/views/slack_handlers.py (3)

92-104: Sequential API calls in _validate_users_exist could be slow for many users.

Each user ID triggers a separate Slack API call. For huddles with many participants, this adds latency. Consider batching if Slack's API supports it, or adding a reasonable limit on participant count.

---

3169-3192: Poll creation is not transactional with Slack message posting.

If chat_postMessage fails after the poll is created in the database, an orphaned poll (with message_ts=None) remains. Consider wrapping the DB operations in a transaction or adding cleanup for polls without message_ts.

---

3602-3631: Same transactional concern as polls—orphaned huddles if Slack API fails.

If chat_postMessage fails after huddle creation, an orphaned record with message_ts=None remains. Consider consistent cleanup or transactional handling across all commands.

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

website/models.py (1)

3724-3742: Consider the unique constraint for single-vote enforcement.

The unique_together = ["poll", "voter_id", "option"] constraint allows users to vote for multiple options (one vote per option). However, the PR objectives mention "single-vote enforcement." This constraint only prevents duplicate votes on the same option, not multiple votes across different options.

If the intention is to enforce strictly one vote per user per poll (regardless of allow_multiple_votes), the constraint should be ["poll", "voter_id"]. Otherwise, the application logic in the handler must enforce single-vote behavior when allow_multiple_votes=False.

Based on past review comments, this constraint design has been previously discussed. Please verify that the handler logic correctly enforces single-vote behavior when allow_multiple_votes=False.

website/views/slack_handlers.py (3)

3571-3573: Wall-clock time parsing uses UTC, not user's local timezone.

When a user says "at 3:00 PM", they likely mean their local time, but timezone.now() returns UTC. This was flagged in a previous review. Consider documenting that times are in UTC, or fetching the user's timezone from their Slack profile.

---

3355-3367: Add validation for non-positive time amounts.

The regex allows zero or negative values to be entered, which would create confusing or invalid reminders. This was flagged in a previous review.

         amount = int(time_match.group(1))
         unit = time_match.group(2)
+
+        if amount <= 0:
+            return JsonResponse(
+                {
+                    "response_type": "ephemeral",
+                    "text": "❌ Time amount must be greater than 0.",
+                }
+            )

         # Calculate remind_at time

---

3548-3555: Add validation for non-positive time amounts in huddle scheduling.

The relative time parser allows zero or negative values. This was flagged in a previous review.

         if time_match:
             amount = int(time_match.group(1))
             unit = time_match.group(2)
+            if amount <= 0:
+                return JsonResponse(
+                    {
+                        "response_type": "ephemeral",
+                        "text": "❌ Please specify a positive number of minutes or hours.",
+                    }
+                )
             now = timezone.now()

website/views/slack_handlers.py (3)

65-69: Overly broad exception handling hides potential bugs.

Catching all exceptions and silently falling back to time.time() can mask unexpected errors. Consider logging a warning so issues are observable.

     try:
         ts = int(dt.timestamp())
-    except Exception:
-        # Fallback to current time if something odd happens
+    except (OSError, OverflowError, ValueError) as e:
+        logger.warning("Failed to convert datetime %s to timestamp: %s", dt, e)
         ts = int(time.time())

---

3169-3178: Poll and options creation should be wrapped in a transaction.

If option creation fails partway through the loop, the poll will exist with incomplete options. Use transaction.atomic() to ensure atomicity.

+from django.db import transaction
+
 ...
-        # Create poll in database
-        poll = SlackPoll.objects.create(
-            creator_id=user_id, workspace_id=team_id, channel_id=channel_id, question=question, status="active"
-        )
-
-        # Create poll options
-        for idx, option_text in enumerate(options):
-            # Sanitize user input to prevent markdown injection
-            sanitized_option_text = re.sub(r"([*_~`>])", r"\\\1", option_text)
-            SlackPollOption.objects.create(poll=poll, option_text=sanitized_option_text, option_number=idx)
+        # Create poll in database atomically
+        with transaction.atomic():
+            poll = SlackPoll.objects.create(
+                creator_id=user_id, workspace_id=team_id, channel_id=channel_id, question=question, status="active"
+            )
+
+            # Create poll options
+            for idx, option_text in enumerate(options):
+                # Sanitize user input to prevent markdown injection
+                sanitized_option_text = re.sub(r"([*_~`>])", r"\\\1", option_text)
+                SlackPollOption.objects.create(poll=poll, option_text=sanitized_option_text, option_number=idx)

---

3606-3619: Huddle and participants creation should be wrapped in a transaction.

Similar to poll creation, if participant creation fails, the huddle will exist without all invited participants.

+from django.db import transaction
+
 ...
-        # Create huddle
-        huddle = SlackHuddle.objects.create(
-            creator_id=user_id,
-            workspace_id=team_id,
-            channel_id=channel_id,
-            title=title,
-            description=sanitized_description,
-            scheduled_at=scheduled_at,
-            status="scheduled",
-        )
-
-        # Add participants
-        for participant_id in participants:
-            SlackHuddleParticipant.objects.create(huddle=huddle, user_id=participant_id, response="invited")
+        # Create huddle atomically
+        with transaction.atomic():
+            huddle = SlackHuddle.objects.create(
+                creator_id=user_id,
+                workspace_id=team_id,
+                channel_id=channel_id,
+                title=title,
+                description=sanitized_description,
+                scheduled_at=scheduled_at,
+                status="scheduled",
+            )
+
+            # Add participants
+            for participant_id in participants:
+                SlackHuddleParticipant.objects.create(huddle=huddle, user_id=participant_id, response="invited")

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

website/tests/test_slack_interactions.py (1)

191-193: Avoid cache.clear() in tests; delete only the rate-limit keys you set

Using cache.clear() in these tests is still a global operation and can interfere with other tests that rely on cache state (especially under parallel execution). Since the rate limiter uses a specific key pattern, you can reset only the keys relevant to these tests.

Example: clear only the huddle rate-limit key

-        # Clear entire cache to avoid rate-limit interference
-        cache.clear()
+        # Clear only the rate-limit key used by /blt_huddle for this user
+        cache.delete(f"slack_rl:huddle:{self.creator_id}")

Apply a similar pattern in the other tests that currently call cache.clear().

Also applies to: 394-396, 426-428

website/views/slack_handlers.py (3)

3140-3262: Poll creation & rendering are robust; consider making creation+post fully atomic

Positives in handle_poll_command / build_poll_blocks:

• Strong input hygiene: quoted parsing, whitespace normalization, truncation, deduplication, and markdown escaping for both question and options.
• Option count limits enforced (2–10, capped by MAX_POLL_OPTIONS).
• Block building uses annotate(votes_count=Count("votes")) to avoid N+1 queries and a progress bar that handles small non-zero percentages gracefully.
• Single-vote semantics enforced in SlackPollVote (DB uniqueness) and handle_poll_vote.

One improvement for data hygiene: if chat_postMessage fails, a SlackPoll is already created with message_ts=None. The vote/close/reopen handlers now guard against missing message_ts, so this no longer crashes, but it still leaves orphaned polls that never made it to Slack.

You could mirror the huddle pattern and wrap poll creation and posting in a single transaction so failed posts fully roll back.

Sketch of making poll creation transactional

 def handle_poll_command(workspace_client, user_id, team_id, channel_id, text, activity):
@@
-        # Create poll in database
-        poll = SlackPoll.objects.create(
-            creator_id=user_id, workspace_id=team_id, channel_id=channel_id, question=question, status="active"
-        )
-
-        # Create poll options
-        for idx, option_text in enumerate(cleaned_options):
-            # Sanitize user input to prevent markdown injection
-            sanitized_option_text = re.sub(r"([*_~`>])", r"\\\1", option_text)
-            SlackPollOption.objects.create(poll=poll, option_text=sanitized_option_text, option_number=idx)
-
-        # Build Slack message blocks
-        blocks = build_poll_blocks(poll)
-
-        # Post poll to channel (best-effort join first)
-        _ensure_bot_in_channel(workspace_client, channel_id)
-        response = workspace_client.chat_postMessage(channel=channel_id, text=f"📊 Poll: {question}", blocks=blocks)
-
-        # Store message timestamp for updates
-        poll.message_ts = response["ts"]
-        poll.save()
+        with transaction.atomic():
+            # Create poll in database
+            poll = SlackPoll.objects.create(
+                creator_id=user_id, workspace_id=team_id, channel_id=channel_id, question=question, status="active"
+            )
+
+            # Create poll options
+            for idx, option_text in enumerate(cleaned_options):
+                sanitized_option_text = re.sub(r"([*_~`>])", r"\\\1", option_text)
+                SlackPollOption.objects.create(poll=poll, option_text=sanitized_option_text, option_number=idx)
+
+            # Build Slack message blocks
+            blocks = build_poll_blocks(poll)
+
+            # Post poll to channel (best-effort join first)
+            _ensure_bot_in_channel(workspace_client, channel_id)
+            response = workspace_client.chat_postMessage(
+                channel=channel_id, text=f"📊 Poll: {question}", blocks=blocks
+            )
+
+            # Store message timestamp for updates
+            poll.message_ts = response["ts"]
+            poll.save(update_fields=["message_ts"])

Also applies to: 3277-3361

---

3812-3865: Huddle time parsing works but lacks bounds and detailed validation

The /blt_huddle edit and create flows correctly support both “in N minutes/hours/days” and “at HH:MM [AM/PM]” formats, and you’ve added a nice “time has already passed today” guard for the at case. However:

• The “in” paths don’t enforce amount > 0 or any upper bound, unlike reminders. Extremely large values (in 999999999 days) can overflow datetime arithmetic and fall into the generic error handler.
• The at parsing for both create and edit paths doesn’t validate hour/minute ranges; invalid inputs like at 25:99 will reach now.replace() and raise ValueError, again surfacing only as a generic error.

If you want huddles to be as robust as reminders, consider:

• Applying a similar “> 0 and ≤ 1 year” cap for in amounts.
• Validating hour/minute ranges (and AM/PM) before calling replace, and returning a specific ephemeral error for invalid times.

Illustrative validation enhancements for the at path

-            at_match = re.search(r"at\s+(\d{1,2}):(\d{2})\s*(AM|PM)?", remainder, re.IGNORECASE)
+            at_match = re.search(r"at\s+(\d{1,2}):(\d{2})\s*(AM|PM)?", remainder, re.IGNORECASE)
             if at_match:
                 hour = int(at_match.group(1))
                 minute = int(at_match.group(2))
                 am_pm = at_match.group(3)
-                if am_pm:
-                    if am_pm.upper() == "PM" and hour < 12:
-                        hour += 12
-                    elif am_pm.upper() == "AM" and hour == 12:
-                        hour = 0
+                # Validate ranges first
+                if minute < 0 or minute > 59:
+                    return JsonResponse(
+                        {
+                            "response_type": "ephemeral",
+                            "text": "❌ That time isn't valid. Please use a valid time like 'at 3:30 PM' or 'at 15:30'.",
+                        }
+                    )
+                if am_pm:
+                    if hour < 1 or hour > 12:
+                        return JsonResponse(
+                            {
+                                "response_type": "ephemeral",
+                                "text": "❌ That time isn't valid. Please use a valid time like 'at 3:30 PM'.",
+                            }
+                        )
+                    if am_pm.upper() == "PM" and hour < 12:
+                        hour += 12
+                    elif am_pm.upper() == "AM" and hour == 12:
+                        hour = 0
+                else:
+                    if hour < 0 or hour > 23:
+                        return JsonResponse(
+                            {
+                                "response_type": "ephemeral",
+                                "text": "❌ That time isn't valid. Please use a valid time like 'at 09:30' or 'at 21:45'.",
+                            }
+                        )

You can mirror similar checks in the main create flow and optionally add caps for large in amounts as you did for reminders.

Also applies to: 3914-3963

---

3364-3653: Refactor slash snooze to reuse _compute_remind_at validation and avoid logic duplication

The reminder implementation is well-structured overall: _compute_remind_at centralizes amount/unit validation and is correctly reused by the create and edit paths. However, the slash snooze subcommand duplicates this validation and timedelta construction instead of calling the helper. The snooze logic reimplements the identical bounds (525600 minutes, 8760 hours, 365 days) and error messages, making the two paths prone to drift.

Refactoring the snooze subcommand to reuse _compute_remind_at (or a shared helper wrapping it with snooze-specific response messages) would eliminate duplication and guarantee consistent validation across all reminder modification paths.

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

website/views/slack_handlers.py (2)

3800-3865: Huddle time parsing still lacks bounds and hour/minute validation (edge-case UX issues)

The /blt_huddle edit and create flows both:

• Accept "in N <minutes|hours|days>" without checking N > 0 or enforcing an upper bound (unlike reminders, which cap at ~1 year via _compute_remind_at).
• For "at HH:MM [AM/PM]", directly call timezone.now().replace(hour=hour, minute=minute, ...) without validating that hour/minute are within valid ranges.

This means inputs like in 99999999 days or at 25:99 can raise OverflowError/ValueError and fall through to the generic “❌ An error occurred. Please try again.” handler instead of a clear validation error, and “at 3:00 PM” is interpreted as 15:00 UTC rather than the user’s local wall‑clock time.

Suggested direction (non‑blocking but worth tightening):

• Mirror _compute_remind_at’s semantics for huddles: require amount > 0 and cap minutes/hours/days to something reasonable (e.g., 1 year).
• Add explicit hour/minute validation for the "at" form (e.g., 0–23 for 24h or 1–12 with AM/PM, minute 0–59) and return a targeted error instead of relying on replace() raising.
• Consider using timezone.localtime() or a user/workspace timezone when interpreting "at HH:MM" so wall‑clock semantics are clearer.

[Suggesting as a follow-up since earlier reviews already touched on this area.]

What are common best practices for parsing user-entered wall-clock times (e.g., "at 3:30 PM") in Slack bots, especially regarding user timezone handling and bounds checking?

Also applies to: 3915-3957

---

3744-3747: Sanitization helper is HTML‑only; consider aligning naming and usage with actual behavior

escape_slack_markdown currently only escapes &, <, and > but is documented as:

def escape_slack_markdown(text: str) -> str:
    """Escapes Slack's markdown-like characters."""

You now use it consistently for:

• Poll question and options (handle_poll_command),
• Reminder messages (create/edit/list),
• Huddle titles/descriptions (handle_huddle_command),
• Various mrkdwn sections that interpolate user text.

Given the implementation, this function is really an HTML/entity escape to prevent <@user>/<http://...>/& artifacts, not a full Slack markdown escape (it doesn’t touch *, _, ~, `, etc.). That’s fine security‑wise, since the critical thing is neutralizing </> and &, but the name/docstring overstate what it does.

I’d suggest either:

• Renaming/doc‑tweaking it to something like escape_slack_entities / “Escape &, <, > for safe inclusion in Slack text/mrkdwn”, or
• Extending it to also backslash‑escape Slack markdown control characters if you want truly literal rendering in mrkdwn fields.

This is non‑blocking, but clarifying intent here will make future uses less error‑prone.

How does Slack's mrkdwn treat characters like `*`, `_`, `~`, ``` ` ```, and when is it necessary to escape them vs the `<` / `>` entity encoding?

Also applies to: 3188-3245, 3909-3913, 4032-4037, 3704-3710

website/views/slack_handlers.py (1)

3656-3735: Reminder list actions: “Cancel” vs “Snooze” semantics for reminders assigned by others

list_user_reminders(..., scope_all=True) shows both “Cancel” and “Snooze 1h” buttons for:

• reminders you created, and
• reminders created by someone else but targeted to you.

Behavior now is:

• handle_reminder_snooze correctly allows either the creator or the target to snooze (good).
• handle_reminder_cancel only allows the creator to cancel (also good), but still renders a Cancel button for non‑creators, producing a “❌ Only the reminder creator can cancel it.” error when clicked.

So the UI suggests an action that is guaranteed to fail for reminders where you’re only the recipient.

Consider one of:

• Hiding the Cancel button in list_user_reminders when scope_all=True and reminder.creator_id != user_id, or
• Keeping the button but tweaking the label/help text so it’s clear only the creator can cancel.

The logic itself is correct; this is mostly a UX clean‑up.

Also applies to: 4342-4365, 4429-4476

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

website/views/slack_handlers.py (6)

4318-4348: Reminder cancellation now correctly uses the boolean return from .cancel()

handle_reminder_cancel checks creator permissions, ensures status is pending, and then relies on reminder.cancel()’s boolean result to distinguish between a successful cancel and a concurrent status change. The fallback “no longer pending” response correctly covers the race where the scheduler or another action updated the status between load and cancel.

---

4351-4402: Huddle response handler is correct and fixes the action_id suffix bug

• Mapping response ("accepted"/"declined") to "accept"/"decline" for the action_id prefix fixes the previous huddle_{response}_ parsing bug.
• You correctly guard on huddle.status == "scheduled" to prevent responses on completed/cancelled huddles.
• SlackHuddleParticipant.get_or_create + update_response(response) implements idempotent updates, and the subsequent message update is robust: it either posts a fresh message when message_ts is missing or calls chat_update otherwise, with guarded logging on failures.

This closes the earlier correctness issue around parsing and keeps participant state consistent.

---

4405-4452: Interactive reminder snooze now handles scheduler races and avoids stale writes

• Using transaction.atomic() plus select_for_update(skip_locked=True) and a fresh status check on status == "pending" prevents the race conditions previously noted with process_slack_reminders_and_huddles.
• Allowing snooze when the acting user is either the creator or the target aligns behavior with what the “Snooze 1h” button affords in list_user_reminders.
• Updating only remind_at via save(update_fields=["remind_at"]) ensures you don’t accidentally revert concurrent status changes to or from "sent"/"failed".

This addresses the prior bug reports around snooze silently failing or corrupting status.

---

4516-4571: Huddle cancellation correctly respects concurrency and Slack update issues

• Cancellation is restricted to the organizer and to huddles in scheduled state.
• Using huddle.cancel()’s boolean return prevents false‑positive successes when the status changed concurrently (e.g., to started), and you surface a clear “no longer scheduled” message when the conditional update doesn’t apply.
• The follow‑up Slack message handling mirrors edit/response flows: guarded against missing message_ts, tolerant of chat_postMessage/chat_update failures, and always returning a success to the user once the DB state has moved to cancelled.

This is a solid, race‑aware implementation of the cancel flow.

---

3140-3361: Poll creation, sanitization, and block building are generally robust

• Channel restriction + per‑user rate limiting are implemented cleanly.
• Parsing "Question" "Option 1" ... with deduplication, whitespace normalization, length caps, and 2–10 option enforcement matches the documented behavior.
• DB writes are simple and build_poll_blocks uses annotated vote counts with a well‑behaved progress bar and creator‑only Close/Reopen controls.
• Guarding poll.message_ts is None in downstream handlers (vote/close/reopen) mitigates orphan‑record edge cases when chat_postMessage fails.

One thing to tighten:

• escape_slack_markdown currently only escapes &, <, and >, while its docstring claims to escape “Slack's markdown‑like characters”. If the intent is to keep poll questions/options purely textual (no bold/italic/strikethrough), consider either extending the helper to also backslash‑escape *, _, ~, `, etc., or updating the docstring and comments so it’s clear that markdown styling is intentionally allowed here.

What are the recommended escaping rules for user-provided text in Slack Block Kit messages to prevent unintended markdown formatting?

---

3725-4146: Huddle command covers the main flows but needs stronger time input validation

Good aspects:

• Channel restriction + per‑user rate limiting mirror the poll/reminder behavior.
• list and edit flows reuse the same handler and list_channel_huddles paginates correctly, with participant counts via annotation.
• Creation sanitizes title and description with escape_slack_markdown, validates participants via _validate_users_exist, and wraps SlackHuddle + SlackHuddleParticipant creation and chat_postMessage in a single transaction.atomic() block, avoiding orphaned huddles on Slack failures.
• Edit flow supports both relative (“in X minutes/hours/days”) and wall‑clock (“at HH:MM [AM/PM]”) rescheduling and rewrites the Slack message or posts a new one if message_ts was missing.

Two validation gaps remain:

1. Missing hour/minute range checks for "at HH:MM" (edit + create)

   • Inputs like at 25:99 or at 13:00 PM will pass the regex but cause timezone.now().replace(hour=..., minute=...) to raise ValueError. This bubbles to the outer except Exception and returns a generic “An error occurred” instead of a clear “invalid time” message.
   • Recommend validating minute in 0..59 and hour ranges before calling .replace():
     • With AM/PM: hour in 1..12, then map to 0–23.
     • Without AM/PM: hour in 0..23.

2. No upper bounds or positivity checks for "in N <unit>" in huddles

   • Unlike reminders, huddles accept any non‑negative integer via regex and directly compute now + timedelta(...). Extremely large values risk OverflowError and there’s no explicit “too long” validation or amount > 0 check.
   • For consistency and safety, consider reusing _compute_remind_at or a sibling helper for huddles (possibly with different copy in the error messages) so you get:
     • amount > 0 enforced.
     • Reasonable upper caps (e.g., up to 1 year).
     • Shared behavior between create and edit.

Addressing these keeps errors user‑friendly and prevents noisy log entries from simple invalid inputs.

How does Python's `datetime.replace` behave when given out-of-range hour or minute values (e.g., 25:99), and what exception type is raised?

website/views/slack_handlers.py (1)

3364-3723: Reminder time computation and flows are much cleaner; only minor nits left

Positives:

• _compute_remind_at centralizes validation (amount > 0, 1‑year caps per unit, invalid unit handling) and is correctly reused in create, edit, and slash‑snooze branches.
• Creation, edit, and snooze all now sanitize messages via escape_slack_markdown before persistence, aligning with how messages are later rendered in blocks/DMs.
• Slash snooze uses transaction.atomic() + select_for_update(skip_locked=True) and save(update_fields=["remind_at"]), which addresses the races with the background scheduler that were previously called out.
• list_user_reminders’ pagination and the “scope_all” behavior (including reminders assigned to you) are clear, and the button wiring for Cancel/Snooze matches the handlers.

Minor issues / suggestions:

• handle_reminder_command’s docstring still says “/remind” even though the actual command is /blt_remind; worth updating to prevent confusion for future maintainers.
• In list_user_reminders, the “Snooze 1h” button is shown for all reminders in scope; the interactive handler now correctly permits snooze when the acting user is either creator or target, which is good. If you expect many cross‑assigned reminders, you might consider reflecting this in the text (e.g., clarifying that both creator and assignee can snooze) but it’s not required from a correctness standpoint.

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting