Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@jmthomas
Copy link
Member

closes #2285

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 27, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 79.99%. Comparing base (0c4167b) to head (9789577).
⚠️ Report is 37 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2303   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   79.99%   79.99%           
=======================================
  Files         641      641           
  Lines       47980    47980           
  Branches      744      744           
=======================================
+ Hits        38381    38383    +2     
+ Misses       9517     9515    -2     
  Partials       82       82           
Flag Coverage Δ
python 83.56% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
ruby-api 84.28% <ø> (ø)
ruby-backend 82.66% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@clayandgen
Copy link
Contributor

I used this screen:

SCREEN AUTO AUTO 1.0

VERTICAL
  VERTICALBOX "Header"
    LABELVALUE INST LATEST TEMP1HIGH
  END
END

and I think I'm still seeing the issue 🤔

also -- does this address the sparkline issue? I don't see sparklines populate with the following screen:

SCREEN AUTO AUTO 1.0

VERTICAL
  VERTICALBOX "Header"
    SPARKLINE INST HEALTH_STATUS TEMP1
      SETTING SIZE 400 50
      SETTING HISTORY 30s
  END
END

@jmthomas
Copy link
Member Author

I didn't check the Sparkline ... forgot about that addition to the ticket. I'll double check your telemetry point and verify Sparkline functionality.

Copy link
Contributor

@clayandgen clayandgen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Screenshot 2025-09-04 at 5 56 51 PM Behavior looks to be fixed! 🎉

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Sep 8, 2025

@jmthomas jmthomas merged commit 9061d02 into main Sep 8, 2025
26 of 30 checks passed
@jmthomas jmthomas deleted the quest_column branch September 8, 2025 03:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TSDB Playback on Derived Mnemonics

4 participants