Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

fix: 🚑 Introduce try-except for RegressionMetrics #516

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2022
Merged

fix: 🚑 Introduce try-except for RegressionMetrics #516

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2022

Conversation

@Anselmoo
Copy link
Owner

@Anselmoo Anselmoo commented Dec 13, 2022 •
edited
Loading

All PR-Submissions:

  • Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
  • Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open
    Pull Requests for the same
    update/change?

New ✨✨ Feature-Submissions:

Changes to ⚙️ Core-Features:

  • Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like
    us to include them?
  • Have you written new tests for your core changes, as applicable?
  • Have you successfully run tests with your changes locally?

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Dec 13, 2022

Sourcery Code Quality Report

✅  Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.30%.

Quality metrics Before After Change
Complexity 11.20 🙂 11.11 🙂 -0.09 👍
Method Length 53.34 ⭐ 53.62 ⭐ 0.28 👎
Working memory 7.82 🙂 7.69 🙂 -0.13 👍
Quality 65.64% 🙂 65.94% 🙂 0.30% 👍
Other metrics Before After Change
Lines 402 403 1
Changed files Quality Before Quality After Quality Change
spectrafit/report.py 65.64% 🙂 65.94% 🙂 0.30% 👍

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File Function Complexity Length Working Memory Quality Recommendation
spectrafit/report.py fit_report_as_dict 33 ⛔ 345 ⛔ 14 😞 20.13% ⛔ Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
spectrafit/report.py _extracted_gof_from_results 19 😞 213 ⛔ 12 😞 36.66% 😞 Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

  • ⭐ excellent
  • 🙂 good
  • 😞 poor
  • ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the python Pull requests that update Python code label Dec 13, 2022
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@Anselmoo Anselmoo merged commit eacd686 into main Dec 13, 2022
@Anselmoo Anselmoo deleted the Anselmoo/issue515 branch December 13, 2022 11:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

python Pull requests that update Python code

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Catch negative Intensity out of the regression analysis

1 participant

@Anselmoo