Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

update "lein uberjar" for version 2.12 #3407

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
vuorioma wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

update "lein uberjar" for version 2.12 #3407

vuorioma wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

@vuorioma
Copy link
Collaborator

@vuorioma vuorioma commented Dec 10, 2025

Checklist for author

Remove items that aren't applicable, check items that are done.

Reviewability

  • Link to issue
  • Note if PR is on top of other PR
  • Note if related change in rems-deploy repo
  • Consider adding screenshots for ease of review

Backwards compatibility

  • API is backwards compatible or completely new
  • Events are backwards compatible or have migrations
  • Config is backwards compatible
  • Feature appears correctly in PDF print

Documentation

  • Update changelog if necessary
  • API is documented and shows up in Swagger UI
  • Components are added to guide page
  • Update docs/ (if applicable)
  • Update manual/ (if applicable)
  • ADR for major architectural decisions or experiments
  • New config options in config-defaults.edn

Testing

  • Complex logic is unit tested
  • Valuable features are integration / browser / acceptance tested automatically

Follow-up

  • New tasks are created for pending or remaining tasks

pikariop
pikariop approved these changes Dec 11, 2025
View reviewed changes
project.clj Outdated

:profiles
{:uberjar {:omit-source true
{:uberjar {:dependencies [[binaryage/devtools "1.0.7"]
Copy link
Collaborator

@pikariop pikariop Dec 11, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suppose we could put these straight into the top level dependencies along with :project/dev dependencies to avoid multiple sources of truth, since both appear to be identical

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@pikariop pikariop pikariop approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@vuorioma @pikariop