feat: add SetComment method and related tests for Move struct #28
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new method Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant T as Test
participant M as Move
T->>M: Call SetComment("Sample comment")
M-->>T: Update comment field with "Sample comment"
sequenceDiagram
participant T as Test
participant M as Move
T->>M: Call GetCommand("key")
alt Command exists
M-->>T: Return command value
else Command does not exist
M->>M: Initialize command map
M-->>T: Return false
end
sequenceDiagram
participant T as Test
participant M as Move
T->>M: Call SetNAG(newValue)
M-->>T: Update NAG field to newValue
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #28 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 70.24% 70.65% +0.41%
==========================================
Files 27 27
Lines 4476 4478 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 3144 3164 +20
+ Misses 1196 1178 -18
Partials 136 136 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
move_test.go (2)
370-378: Remove unnecessary subtest.Since there's only one test case, the subtest wrapper can be removed to simplify the code.
Apply this diff to simplify the test:
-func TestNAGReturnsCorrectValue(t *testing.T) { - t.Run("NAGReturnsCorrectValue", func(t *testing.T) { - move := &Move{nag: "!!"} - expected := "!!" - if move.NAG() != expected { - t.Fatalf("expected %v but got %v", expected, move.NAG()) - } - }) -} +func TestNAGReturnsCorrectValue(t *testing.T) { + move := &Move{nag: "!!"} + expected := "!!" + if move.NAG() != expected { + t.Fatalf("expected %v but got %v", expected, move.NAG()) + } +}
380-389: Remove unnecessary subtest.Since there's only one test case, the subtest wrapper can be removed to simplify the code.
Apply this diff to simplify the test:
-func TestSetNAGUpdatesNAG(t *testing.T) { - t.Run("SetNAGUpdatesNAG", func(t *testing.T) { - move := &Move{} - move.SetNAG("??") - expected := "??" - if move.NAG() != expected { - t.Fatalf("expected %v but got %v", expected, move.NAG()) - } - }) -} +func TestSetNAGUpdatesNAG(t *testing.T) { + move := &Move{} + move.SetNAG("??") + expected := "??" + if move.NAG() != expected { + t.Fatalf("expected %v but got %v", expected, move.NAG()) + } +}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
move.go(1 hunks)move_test.go(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: vulncheck
🔇 Additional comments (6)
move.go (1)
87-89: LGTM!The
SetCommentmethod is simple, focused, and consistent with other setter methods in the file. It complements the existingAddCommentmethod by providing a way to directly set comments instead of appending them.move_test.go (5)
323-330: LGTM!The test is well-structured, following the Arrange-Act-Assert pattern, and effectively verifies the basic functionality of
SetComment.
332-339: LGTM!The test effectively verifies that
SetCommentoverwrites existing comments, which is a key differentiator fromAddComment.
341-348: LGTM!The test verifies the important edge case of clearing comments by setting an empty string.
350-368: LGTM!The test is well-organized using subtests and thoroughly verifies the
AddCommentfunctionality for both existing and empty comments.
391-418: LGTM!The test is well-organized using subtests and thoroughly verifies all important scenarios for command retrieval.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests