-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
chore(deps): update dependency crypto-js to v4.2.0 [security] #900
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
19f8fa2 to
7fa61e3
Compare
7fa61e3 to
ca45bff
Compare
|
ca45bff to
4b67b59
Compare
|
4b67b59 to
85970b1
Compare
|
85970b1 to
8a6af56
Compare
8a6af56 to
db6b19c
Compare
db6b19c to
49a4c95
Compare
49a4c95 to
e59abf3
Compare
e59abf3 to
7b8f6b4
Compare
40b4815 to
1a1100e
Compare
1a1100e to
204bfe2
Compare
204bfe2 to
a2f50d2
Compare
a2f50d2 to
dad277c
Compare
dad277c to
34629ab
Compare
34629ab to
5207591
Compare
5207591 to
8437c7b
Compare
8437c7b to
0f129ab
Compare
0f129ab to
665edbf
Compare
|
665edbf to
cdc172f
Compare
Deploying it-tools-legacy with
|
| Latest commit: |
3c40d48
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://925cb6da.it-tools-legacy.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://renovate-npm-crypto-js-vulne.it-tools-legacy.pages.dev |
37c9c95 to
dfb14a2
Compare
dfb14a2 to
1ce9cc9
Compare
1ce9cc9 to
c78fb6a
Compare
c78fb6a to
3c40d48
Compare
|
This PR contains the following updates:
4.1.1->4.2.0GitHub Vulnerability Alerts
CVE-2023-46233
Impact
Summary
Crypto-js PBKDF2 is 1,000 times weaker than originally specified in 1993, and at least 1,300,000 times weaker than current industry standard. This is because it both (1) defaults to SHA1, a cryptographic hash algorithm considered insecure since at least 2005 and (2) defaults to one single iteration, a 'strength' or 'difficulty' value specified at 1,000 when specified in 1993. PBKDF2 relies on iteration count as a countermeasure to preimage and collision attacks.
Potential Impact:
Probability / risk analysis / attack enumeration:
Update: PBKDF2 requires a pseudo-random function that takes two inputs, so HMAC-SHA1 is used rather than plain SHA1. HMAC is not affected by length extension attacks. However, by defaulting to a single PBKDF2 iteration, the hashes do not benefit from the extra computational complexity that PBKDF2 is supposed to provide. The resulting hashes therefore have little protection against an offline brute-force attack.
crypto-js has 10,642 public users as displayed on NPM, today October 11th 2023. The number of transient dependents is likely several orders of magnitude higher.
A very rough GitHub search shows 432 files cross GitHub using PBKDF2 in crypto-js in Typescript or JavaScript, but not specifying any number of iterations.
Affected versions
All versions are impacted. This code has been the same since crypto-js was first created.
Further Cryptanalysis
The issue here is especially egregious because the length extension attack makes useless any secret that might be appended to the plaintext before calculating its signature.
Consider a scheme in which a secret is created for a user's username, and that secret is used to protect e.g. their passwords. Let's say that password is 'fake-password', and their username is 'example-username'.
To encrypt the user password via symmetric encryption we might do
encrypt(plaintext: 'fake-password', encryption_key: cryptojs.pbkdf2(value: 'example username' + salt_or_pepper)). By this means, we would, in theory, create anencryption_keythat can be determined from the public username, but which requires the secretsalt_or_pepperto generate. This is a common scheme for protecting passwords, as exemplified in bcrypt & scrypt. Because the encryption key is symmetric, we can use this derived key to also decrypt the ciphertext.Because of the length extension issue, if the attacker obtains (via attack 1), a collision with 'example username', the attacker does not need to know
salt_or_pepperto decrypt their account data, only their public username.Description
PBKDF2 is a key-derivation is a key-derivation function that is used for two main purposes: (1) to stretch or squash a variable length password's entropy into a fixed size for consumption by another cryptographic operation and (2) to reduce the chance of downstream operations recovering the password input (for example, for password storage).
Unlike the modern webcrypto standard, crypto-js does not throw an error when a number of iterations is not specified, and defaults to one single iteration. In the year 2000, when PBKDF2 was originally specified, the minimum number of iterations suggested was set at 1,000. Today, OWASP recommends 1,300,000:
https://github.com/brix/crypto-js/blob/4dcaa7afd08f48cd285463b8f9499cdb242605fa/src/pbkdf2.js#L22-L26
Patches
No available patch. The package is not maintained.
Workarounds
Consult the OWASP PBKDF2 Cheatsheet. Configure to use SHA256 with at least 250,000 iterations.
Coordinated disclosure
This issue was simultaneously submitted to crypto-js and crypto-es on the 23rd of October 2023.
Caveats
This issue was found in a security review that was not scoped to crypto-js. This report is not an indication that crypto-js has undergone a formal security assessment by the author.
Release Notes
brix/crypto-js (crypto-js)
v4.2.0Compare Source
Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.