Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Update components to match GEOSgcm v11 as of 2025-Sep-19#836

Merged
gmao-rreichle merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
feature/update-components-2025Sep19
Sep 24, 2025
Merged

Update components to match GEOSgcm v11 as of 2025-Sep-19#836
gmao-rreichle merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
feature/update-components-2025Sep19

Conversation

@mathomp4
Copy link
Member

This PR updates the components in GEOSldas to match that of GEOSgcm main as of 2025-Sep-19. This brings in a few things:

  • ESMA_env v5.13.0
    • Update to Baselibs 8.18.0
      • ESMF 8.9.0
      • curl 8.15.0
      • NCO 5.3.4
      • CDO 2.5.3
      • nccmp 1.10.0.0
      • Removed szip, added libaec
        • Note: To use libaec correctly, users should use ESMA_cmake v3.63.0/v4.20.0 or higher
  • ESMA_cmake v3.64.0
    • Support for libaec in Baselibs
  • GMAO_Shared v2.1.4
    • Changes to some scripts and esma_mpirun
  • GEOS_Util v2.1.10
  • MAPL 2.59.1
    • Support for ESMF v9
    • Various fixes and features

I've also updated some CI to test if all this works.

The most important part of this is MAPL 2.59.1. That is important because it provides support for ESMF v9. Now, MAPL2 (and thus GEOSgcm, GEOSldas, etc.) does not require ESMF v9 but MAPL3 does. But, having support to use ESMF v9 allows us to keep around a single set of Baselibs/ESMA_env.

Second, #835 by @biljanaorescanin trumps this in terms of GEOS_Util, but I decided to just echo GEOSgcm main

Third, as I know @gmao-rreichle will probably spot it, ESMA_env went from v4 to v5. Now, that difference is because ESMA_env v5 has Baselibs v8 which includes FMS (which doesn't matter to GEOSldas).

I'm going to keep this draft until it can be tested by @biljanaorescanin or others. But I wanted to get this in to see what CI does.

@mathomp4 mathomp4 self-assigned this Sep 19, 2025
@biljanaorescanin
Copy link
Contributor

All tests passed.

@mathomp4
Copy link
Member Author

All tests passed.

Hooray! Thanks for testing. I'll undraft.

@mathomp4 mathomp4 marked this pull request as ready for review September 22, 2025 12:11
@mathomp4 mathomp4 requested review from a team as code owners September 22, 2025 12:11
@gmao-rreichle gmao-rreichle merged commit d97ef53 into develop Sep 24, 2025
11 checks passed
@gmao-rreichle gmao-rreichle deleted the feature/update-components-2025Sep19 branch September 24, 2025 17:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

Comments