Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@Ruturaj4
Copy link
Contributor

@Ruturaj4 Ruturaj4 commented Jun 30, 2025

  • Added Dockerfile.maxtext to extend the existing jax-ubu22 base image with MaxText source and dependencies.
  • Updated GitHub Actions workflow to:
    • Build the MaxText image using the base image (jax-ubu22.rocm<version>)
    • Tag the image with:
      • nightly for latest builds
      • <commit_sha> for traceability
      • run<github.run_id> for one-to-one mapping with workflow runs
    • Push the image to GitHub Container Registry (GHCR)
  • Adjusted the container launch step to use the correct run<run_id> tag.

This enables consistent nightly builds and version tracking for MaxText performance evaluation runs.

@Ruturaj4 Ruturaj4 requested a review from charleshofer June 30, 2025 16:11
@Ruturaj4 Ruturaj4 force-pushed the update_perf_ci branch 3 times, most recently from 15c2d8c to 9caf1e9 Compare July 1, 2025 23:37
Copy link
Collaborator

@charleshofer charleshofer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Not a huge deal if we fix the branch name before merging. Depends on what we can do with the maxtext repo.

RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y git

# Clone MaxText from rv_jax branch.
ARG MAXTEXT_BRANCH=rv_jax
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor, but I think this would be better to set in the workflow file so that we can just look at the workflow file to tell where maxtext is pulled from. Could we name this just jax, instead of having your initials in there, too πŸ˜›

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok yes, I need to change the jax branch in the maxtext repo. Maybe change it to jax_perf.

@Ruturaj4 Ruturaj4 merged commit caa763d into master Jul 14, 2025
7 checks passed
@Ruturaj4 Ruturaj4 deleted the update_perf_ci branch July 14, 2025 20:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants