-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 4
Add gopengraph to the Library #87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request adds three new OpenGraph library entries to the documentation: BloodHoundOperator, BloodHound OpenGraph Helper Library, and gopengraph. Each entry includes descriptions, authors/maintainers information, and repository URLs, expanding the community project catalog within the OpenGraph library documentation. Changes
Estimated code review effortπ― 1 (Trivial) | β±οΈ ~5 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touchesβ Failed checks (1 warning)
β Passed checks (2 passed)
β¨ Finishing touchesπ§ͺ Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
π§Ή Nitpick comments (1)
docs/opengraph/library.mdx (1)
300-305: Align description formatting with existing entries.The "Learn more:" section references presentation titles and a blog post without hyperlinks. This differs from the pattern in other entries, which either provide direct links or inline descriptions without external references. Consider either:
- Converting the references to actual hyperlinks, or
- Moving these references into the description text naturally without the "Learn more:" prefix
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
π Files selected for processing (1)
docs/opengraph/library.mdx(2 hunks)
π Additional comments (2)
docs/opengraph/library.mdx (2)
298-311: Verify SpecterOps affiliation for BloodHoundOperator.The entry uses
<SO_Icon_Inline>which indicates SpecterOps authorship, but the maintainer "SadProcessor" is not annotated with@[SpecterOps]affiliation. Review the pattern in other SpecterOps-authored entries (e.g., lines 36, 83, 109) where affiliation is explicitly noted. If SadProcessor is indeed a SpecterOps employee, add the affiliation; otherwise, change the icon to<Icon icon="people-group" size={22}/>to match community-contributed projects.
313-338: BloodHound OpenGraph Helper Library and gopengraph entries look good.Both entries follow the established pattern consistently: clear descriptions, proper author/maintainer attribution with appropriate icons, and valid repository URLs. The gopengraph entry aligns well with the similar bhopengraph tool above it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
P.S. I think that coderabbit is confused π
Summary by CodeRabbit