[dbnode] Add AggregateTilesOptions.Process field #3737
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vpranckaitis
approved these changes
Sep 10, 2021
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3737 +/- ##
========================================
- Coverage 57.1% 56.8% -0.3%
========================================
Files 552 552
Lines 62937 62950 +13
========================================
- Hits 35938 35818 -120
- Misses 23815 23940 +125
- Partials 3184 3192 +8
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it:
Add
AggregateTilesOptions.Processfield (enum). This will be more useful than having a boolean.Special notes for your reviewer:
This overrides #3736.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing and/or backwards incompatible change?:
NONE
Does this PR require updating code package or user-facing documentation?:
NONE