Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

masak
Copy link
Owner

@masak masak commented May 4, 2019

Do not merge yet. All the tests pass and the syntax works, but I feel I have some ways to go in order to make traits as lexical as they should be. Right now they work by string matching, which is too icky to merge.

Figured I'll put this up as a PR. I've been having it as a local branch for ages. The language documentation already assumed we're on decorators, and so I should really finish this one up and merge it.

Closes #257.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Change the syntax of traits from 'is foo(val)' to '@Foo(val)', and let them precede the thing they annotate

1 participant