sub: a fork of sub
This is a fork of sub with an auto-updater and installer. This allows you to write commands in languages that might require some form of installation and in an environments where they change often with many engineers working with them. It removes the hassle of ensuring everyone updates their sub as needed.
Each subcommand executable does not necessarily need to be in bash. It can be any program, shell script, or even a symlink. It just needs to run.
Here's an example of adding a new subcommand. Let's say your sub is named rush. Run:
touch libexec/rush-who
chmod a+x libexec/rush-who
Now open up your editor, and dump in:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -e
whoOf course, this is a simple example...but now rush who should work!
$ rush who
qrush console Sep 14 17:15
You can run any executable in the libexec directly, as long as it follows the NAME-SUBCOMMAND convention. Try out a Ruby script or your favorite language!
Each subcommand can opt into self-documentation, which allows the subcommand to provide information when sub and sub help [SUBCOMMAND] is run.
This is all done by adding a few magic comments. Here's an example from rush who (also see sub commands for another example):
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Usage: sub who
# Summary: Check who's logged in
# Help: This will print out when you run `sub help who`.
# You can have multiple lines even!
#
# Show off an example indented
#
# And maybe start off another one?
set -e
whoNow, when you run sub, the "Summary" magic comment will now show up:
usage: sub <command> [<args>]
Some useful sub commands are:
commands List all sub commands
who Check who's logged in
And running sub help who will show the "Usage" magic comment, and then the "Help" comment block:
Usage: sub who
This will print out when you run `sub help who`.
You can have multiple lines even!
Show off an example indented
And maybe start off another one?
That's not all you get by convention with sub...
Your sub loves autocompletion. It's the mustard, mayo, or whatever topping you'd like that day for your commands. Just like real toppings, you have to opt into them! Sub provides two kinds of autocompletion:
- Automatic autocompletion to find subcommands (What can this sub do?)
- Opt-in autocompletion of potential arguments for your subcommands (What can this subcommand do?)
Opting into autocompletion of subcommands requires that you add a magic comment of (make sure to replace with your sub's name!):
# Provide YOUR_SUB_NAME completions
and then your script must support parsing of a flag: --complete. Here's an example from rbenv, namely rbenv whence:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -e
[ -n "$RBENV_DEBUG" ] && set -x
# Provide rbenv completions
if [ "$1" = "--complete" ]; then
echo --path
exec rbenv shims --short
fi
# lots more bash...Passing the --complete flag to this subcommand short circuits the real command, and then runs another subcommand instead. The output from your subcommand's --complete run is sent to your shell's autocompletion handler for you, and you don't ever have to once worry about how any of that works!
Run the init subcommand after you've prepared your sub to get your sub loading automatically in your shell.
Clone this repo:
git clone git://github.com/37signals/sub.git [name of your sub]
cd [name of your sub]
./prepare.sh [name of your sub]
The prepare script will run you through the steps for making your own sub. Also, don't call it sub, by the way! Give it a better name.
So you've prepared your own sub, now how do you use it? Here's one way you could install your sub in your $HOME directory:
cd
git clone [YOUR GIT HOST URL]/sub.git .sub
For bash users:
echo 'eval "$($HOME/.sub/bin/sub init -)"' >> ~/.bash_profile
exec bash
For zsh users:
echo 'eval "$($HOME/.sub/bin/sub init -)"' >> ~/.zshenv
source ~/.zshenv
You could also install your sub in a different directory, say /usr/local. This is just one way you could provide a way to install your sub.
MIT. See LICENSE.