Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@lewurm
Copy link
Contributor

@lewurm lewurm commented Nov 8, 2018

Commit list for mono/llvm:

Diff: mono/llvm@9f79399...f80899c

Backport #11607

Commit list for mono/llvm:

* mono/llvm@f80899cb3eb [mono] respect hardfloat/softloat setting in ARM ABI (mono#16)
* mono/llvm@f80899cb3eb (HEAD -> master, origin/master) [mono] respect hardfloat/softloat setting in ARM ABI (mono#16)
* mono/llvm@37e14bd72e6 Fix the mono calling convention on arm64+linux.
* mono/llvm@acb33f3436e Pack 32bits llc, opt and llvm-dis in archive as well
* mono/llvm@9b92b4b8760 Merge pull request mono#14 from lateralusX/lateralusX/build-llvm-windows-x64
* mono/llvm@e2ae3309b0c Fixes Mono LLVM usage on Windows x64.
* mono/llvm@384caa9849a Build LLVM Windows x64 using CMake + VS2015 or VS2017.
* mono/llvm@0b3cb8ac12c Emit an LSDA for methods without landing pads too since we need the information about the 'this' register.fbbfbae4fea [ci] Enable x86/amd64 backends. (mono#9)
* mono/llvm@8e14f6654ad Add 3.9 Packaging Scripts and Cross Compilation Support (mono#8)
* mono/llvm@bdb3a116dbf Change some code slighly in AArch64InstrInfo.cpp to work around a gcc optimizer problem. dotnet/android#1182.
* mono/llvm@3b82b3c9041 [ci] Really compile the 32 bit llvm as 32 bit.
* mono/llvm@73c983a02a2 [ci] Distribute 32 bit llvm-config.
* mono/llvm@0692a5ea231 [ci] Install 64-bit binaries into usr64 for consistency.
* mono/llvm@804c869e6b5 [ci] Fix 32 bit build.8dfa8ebfc25 [ci] Compile a 32 bit version of llvm as well.07582cba7cc [ci] Package llvm-config as well.
* mono/llvm@a9cfb50e5af [ci] Fix an rm statement which can fail.
* mono/llvm@a21fcae962a Add a jenkins build script.
* mono/llvm@21492ec92e2 Revert "Add a workaround to the problem where the amd64 JIT would make all calls as register indirect."
* mono/llvm@6aa74ae5723 Fix a regression caused by:
* mono/llvm@5056b9f2bcb Rename the temp labels used by DwarfMonoException so they don't collide with the ones used by the GNU EH frame.
* mono/llvm@975e3a69030 Align the size of the Mono EH table to 8 to prevent an ld assertion. Fixes #55553.
* mono/llvm@dbb6fdffdeb [arm] Handle CallingConv::Mono in getEffectiveCallingConv (), previously it would be handled by the default branch, which would fall through to the next switch case because llvm_unreachable() was a noop in release builds.
* mono/llvm@5b94bc7097e Avoid making the EH table symbol global, its not needed any more.
* mono/llvm@8b1520c8aae Merge pull request mono#6 from Xaltotun/feature/cmake_build
* mono/llvm@8d00fd38456 Fixed MONO_API_VERSION define for the cmake build. For #cmakedefine to work, the variable needs to be declared in the cmake script otherwise it will be commented out in the generated file.
* mono/llvm@73df95d02d3 Merge pull request mono#5 from alexanderkyte/mastere
* mono/llvm@51cd999c98 [mono] Fix MONO_API_VERSION usage with cmake

Diff: mono/llvm@9f79399...f80899c
@lewurm lewurm added this to the 2018-06 (5.16.xx) milestone Nov 8, 2018
@lewurm lewurm requested review from luhenry and vargaz as code owners November 8, 2018 06:22
@lewurm
Copy link
Contributor Author

lewurm commented Nov 8, 2018

@luhenry I'm not sure about this one. I backported mono/llvm@8415fd8 and mono/llvm@c975102 from mono/llvm:release_60 to mono/llvm:master. It seems like our 2018-06 wasn't using HEAD of mono/llvm:master?

@lewurm
Copy link
Contributor Author

lewurm commented Nov 8, 2018

@monojenkins build Linux armv7 AOT+LLVM

@luhenry luhenry closed this Nov 12, 2018
@lewurm
Copy link
Contributor Author

lewurm commented Nov 12, 2018

Closed because we aren't exactly sure what the consequences of it will be regarding Xamarin.Android/Xamarin.iOS. Also, as mentioned here #11095 (comment), the llvm package was removed from the default set of installed packages for our Debian packages on ARM.

@lewurm lewurm reopened this Nov 14, 2018
@lewurm lewurm requested a review from kumpera as a code owner November 14, 2018 14:19
@lewurm
Copy link
Contributor Author

lewurm commented Nov 14, 2018

This is also now a backport of #10674. We should reconsider merging it, see #11627

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants