[mempool] Apply Unlocked* () functions #5387
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@cherusker, |
…perations - avoid blacklisting whole functions with `MONO_NO_SANITIZE_THREAD` - change `long` to `gint64` as it is more portable
bf13cf7 to
7eda8bd
Compare
vargaz
approved these changes
Aug 16, 2017
lewurm
approved these changes
Aug 17, 2017
picenka21
pushed a commit
to picenka21/runtime
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2022
…perations (mono/mono#5387) - avoid blacklisting whole functions with `MONO_NO_SANITIZE_THREAD` - change `long` to `gint64` as it is more portable Commit migrated from mono/mono@aa7cd58
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Finally, I can make peace with the past (x) and close this chapter :)
(x) While working on #5191, I realised that
MONO_NO_SANITIZE_THREADwas not precise enough for most use cases. The first try to fix this (#5255) was not right formempool.c, however, #5310 finally brought an applicable solution.