Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@jfy133
Copy link
Member

@jfy133 jfy133 commented Apr 5, 2022

When we refactored in 2.4.3 files such as the bedfiles, we apparently forgot to make them value channels. Therefore in some cases they were only allowing execution of some processes (e.g. snpcapture qualimpa) against a single channel.

This converts those that I identified from queue back to value channels.

Closes #871

PR checklist

  • This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
  • If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
    • If you've added a new tool - add to the software_versions process and a regex to scrape_software_versions.py
    • If you've added a new tool - have you followed the pipeline conventions in the [contribution docs](https://github.com/nf-core/eager/tree/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md)
    • If necessary, also make a PR on the nf-core/eager branch on the nf-core/test-datasets repository.
  • Make sure your code lints (nf-core lint .).
  • Ensure the test suite passes (nextflow run . -profile test,docker).
  • Usage Documentation in docs/usage.md is updated.
  • Output Documentation in docs/output.md is updated.
  • CHANGELOG.md is updated.
  • README.md is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 5, 2022

This PR is against the master branch ❌

  • Do not close this PR
  • Click Edit and change the base to dev
  • This CI test will remain failed until you push a new commit

Hi @jfy133,

It looks like this pull-request is has been made against the nf-core/eager master branch.
The master branch on nf-core repositories should always contain code from the latest release.
Because of this, PRs to master are only allowed if they come from the nf-core/eager dev branch.

You do not need to close this PR, you can change the target branch to dev by clicking the "Edit" button at the top of this page.
Note that even after this, the test will continue to show as failing until you push a new commit.

Thanks again for your contribution!

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 5, 2022

Markdown linting is failing

To keep the code consistent with lots of contributors, we run automated code consistency checks.
To fix this CI test, please run:

  • Install markdownlint-cli
  • Fix the markdown errors
    • Automatically: markdownlint . --config .github/markdownlint.yml --fix
    • Manually resolve anything left from markdownlint . --config .github/markdownlint.yml

Once you push these changes the test should pass, and you can hide this comment 👍

We highly recommend setting up markdownlint in your code editor so that this formatting is done automatically on save. Ask about it on Slack for help!

Thanks again for your contribution!

@jfy133 jfy133 changed the base branch from master to dev April 5, 2022 18:59
Copy link
Member

@apeltzer apeltzer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤦🏻

@jfy133 jfy133 merged commit efb0ed7 into dev Apr 6, 2022
@jfy133 jfy133 deleted the snpcapbed-fix branch April 6, 2022 06:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Coverage results only computed for one sample when using --snpcapture_bed flag

3 participants