-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 498
Validate umi_read_structure #2071
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Validate umi_read_structure #2071
Conversation
Release PR 3.7.0
This PR is against the
|
|
Ah, that is my bad. |
|
Can you update the changelog please |
Of course, and thank you! |
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| ### Added | ||
|
|
||
| - [#2071](https://github.com/nf-core/sarek/pull/2071) - Updated parameter validation to support the use of umi_read_structure along with umi_in_read_headers |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this should be under Fixed rather than Added.
SPPearce
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test failures are from the sentieon tests as far as I can see.
|
|
||
| ### Fixed | ||
|
|
||
| - [#2071](https://github.com/nf-core/sarek/pull/2071) - Updated parameter validation to support the use of umi_read_structure along with umi_in_read_headers |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this needs ot be moved to the dev section of the changelog
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
like just up, because we had a release in the meantime
|
@sminot can you merge in dev and fix the changelog please? |
|
Thanks @sminot and @FriederikeHanssen |
Addresses #2068
While I have not gone through the checklist, since this is a one-line change I was hoping it would be uncontroversial.