Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@ramprasadn
Copy link
Collaborator

PR checklist

  • This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
  • If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
  • If you've added a new tool - have you followed the pipeline conventions in the contribution docs
  • If necessary, also make a PR on the nf-core/raredisease branch on the nf-core/test-datasets repository.
  • Make sure your code lints (nf-core pipelines lint).
  • Ensure the test suite passes (nextflow run . -profile test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Ensure the test suite passes (nextflow run . -profile test_one_sample,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Check for unexpected warnings in debug mode (nextflow run . -profile debug,test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Usage Documentation in docs/usage.md is updated.
  • Output Documentation in docs/output.md is updated.
  • CHANGELOG.md is updated.
  • README.md is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 20, 2025

nf-core pipelines lint overall result: Passed ✅ ⚠️

Posted for pipeline commit 1046e7a

+| ✅ 204 tests passed       |+
#| ❔   7 tests were ignored |#
!| ❗  20 tests had warnings |!

❗ Test warnings:

  • local_component_structure - align.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - generate_cytosure_files.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - call_structural_variants.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - generate_clinical_set.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - qc_bam.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - call_mobile_elements.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - variant_evaluation.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - call_repeat_expansions.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - annotate_structural_variants.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - annotate_mobile_elements.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - prepare_references.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - annotate_mt_snvs.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - annotate_repeat_expansions.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - annotate_genome_snvs.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - gens.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - call_snv.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - annotate_consequence_pli.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - rank_variants.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - scatter_genome.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure
  • local_component_structure - subsample_mt.nf in subworkflows/local should be moved to a SUBWORKFLOW_NAME/main.nf structure

❔ Tests ignored:

  • files_exist - File is ignored: conf/modules.config
  • files_unchanged - File ignored due to lint config: .github/CONTRIBUTING.md
  • files_unchanged - File ignored due to lint config: .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
  • files_unchanged - File ignored due to lint config: assets/nf-core-raredisease_logo_light.png
  • files_unchanged - File ignored due to lint config: docs/images/nf-core-raredisease_logo_light.png
  • files_unchanged - File ignored due to lint config: docs/images/nf-core-raredisease_logo_dark.png
  • modules_config - modules_config

✅ Tests passed:

Run details

  • nf-core/tools version 3.2.0
  • Run at 2025-03-20 13:53:12

@ramprasadn ramprasadn marked this pull request as ready for review March 20, 2025 10:54
@ramprasadn ramprasadn requested review from fellen31 and jemten March 20, 2025 11:01
Copy link
Contributor

@fellen31 fellen31 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice, missing a changelog though!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

Comment on lines 32 to 34
ch_versions = Channel.empty()
ch_haplog = Channel.empty()
ch_haplogrep_in = Channel.empty()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could be aligned

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be a "Fixed" in the changelog?

Comment on lines 46 to 50
.map { item ->
def meta = item[0]
def model_calls = item[1]
return [meta.sample, meta, model_calls]
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure I understand why this can't be:

Suggested change
.map { item ->
def meta = item[0]
def model_calls = item[1]
return [meta.sample, meta, model_calls]
}
.map { meta, model_calls ->
return [meta.sample, meta, model_calls]
}

Comment on lines 248 to 263
run_rtgvcfeval: ["rtg_truthvcfs"],
skip_repeat_calling: ["variant_catalog"],
skip_repeat_annotation: ["variant_catalog"],
skip_snv_calling: ["genome"],
skip_snv_annotation: ["genome", "vcfanno_resources", "vcfanno_toml", "vep_cache", "vep_cache_version",
"gnomad_af", "score_config_snv", "variant_consequences_snv"],
skip_sv_annotation: ["genome", "vep_cache", "vep_cache_version", "score_config_sv", "variant_consequences_sv"],
skip_mt_annotation: ["genome", "mito_name", "vcfanno_resources", "vcfanno_toml", "score_config_mt",
"vep_cache_version", "vep_cache", "variant_consequences_snv"],
analysis_type_wes: ["target_bed"],
variant_caller_sentieon: ["ml_model"],
skip_germlinecnvcaller: ["ploidy_model", "gcnvcaller_model", "readcount_intervals"],
skip_me_calling: ["mobile_element_references"],
skip_me_annotation: ["mobile_element_svdb_annotations", "variant_consequences_snv"],
skip_gens: ["gens_gnomad_pos", "gens_interval_list", "gens_pon_female", "gens_pon_male"],
skip_smncopynumbercaller: ["genome"]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could perhaps be aligned.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Will have a look to simplify Nallo based on this.

@ramprasadn ramprasadn merged commit dfa7d26 into dev Mar 20, 2025
10 checks passed
@ramprasadn ramprasadn deleted the lang_server_issues branch March 27, 2025 07:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants