Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@nn6n
Copy link
Owner

@nn6n nn6n commented Sep 17, 2025

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the yarn dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • examples/react-data-table/dashboard-app/package.json
  • examples/react-data-table/dashboard-app/yarn.lock

Note for zero-installs users

If you are using the Yarn feature zero-installs that was introduced in Yarn V2, note that this PR does not update the .yarn/cache/ directory meaning this code cannot be pulled and immediately developed on as one would expect for a zero-install project - you will need to run yarn to update the contents of the ./yarn/cache directory.
If you are not using zero-install you can ignore this as your flow should likely be unchanged.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
SNYK-JS-IP-12704893
  788  
high severity Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
SNYK-JS-IP-12761655
  788  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)

…react-data-table/dashboard-app/yarn.lock to reduce vulnerabilities

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-IP-12704893
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-IP-12761655
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @nn6n, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, focuses on enhancing the security of the "react-data-table/dashboard-app" example by upgrading the "react-scripts" dependency to its latest major version, "5.0.0". This critical update resolves two high-severity Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities, ensuring a more secure application environment. The changes primarily involve updating the project's "package.json" and "yarn.lock" files to reflect the new dependency version.

Highlights

  • Dependency Upgrade: Upgraded the "react-scripts" package from version "3.4.4" to "5.0.0".
  • Security Fixes: Addressed two high-severity Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities (SNYK-JS-IP-12704893 and SNYK-JS-IP-12761655) by performing the dependency upgrade.
  • File Changes: Modified "examples/react-data-table/dashboard-app/package.json" and "examples/react-data-table/dashboard-app/yarn.lock" to reflect the updated dependency.
  • Zero-Install Guidance: Included a note for Yarn zero-install users, advising them to run "yarn" to update the ".yarn/cache/" directory after pulling the changes.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, upgrades react-scripts from version 3.4.4 to 5.0.0 to resolve two high-severity SSRF vulnerabilities. While this is a crucial security update, it's a major version bump that introduces significant breaking changes. My review highlights the potential compatibility issues with other dependencies, the need to specify a Node.js version, and the risk of using SKIP_PREFLIGHT_CHECK. Thorough testing and likely further dependency updates will be required after merging.

"react-router": "^5.2.0",
"react-router-dom": "^5.2.0",
"react-scripts": "3.4.4"
"react-scripts": "5.0.0"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Upgrading react-scripts is essential for security, but this major version jump from v3.4.4 to v5.0.0 introduces significant breaking changes and is likely to break the build or application functionality.

Here are some key areas to investigate to ensure the application remains stable:

  • Breaking Changes in react-scripts@5: This version includes major updates like webpack 5, Jest 27, and PostCSS 8.

    • Node.js Polyfills: Webpack 5 no longer automatically includes polyfills for Node.js core modules. If any of your dependencies rely on modules like crypto, stream, or buffer, the application may crash in the browser. You may need to add these polyfills manually.
    • Dependency Compatibility: Several dependencies are outdated and may be incompatible with react-scripts@5. For instance, @material-ui/core@4 (now @mui/material), chart.js@2, and @testing-library/react@9 might cause conflicts or unexpected behavior. It's highly recommended to review and update other dependencies to versions compatible with the new build setup.
  • Node.js Version Requirement: react-scripts@5 requires Node.js 14 or higher. To prevent build issues for developers using older Node.js versions, consider adding an engines field to your package.json:

    "engines": {
      "node": ">=14.0.0"
    }
  • SKIP_PREFLIGHT_CHECK Flag: The start and build scripts use SKIP_PREFLIGHT_CHECK=true. This flag hides potential dependency version mismatches. It's strongly advised to remove this flag to identify and resolve any underlying dependency conflicts that this major upgrade might introduce.

Given the scope of these changes, thorough testing of the entire application (build, tests, and runtime behavior) is critical after this upgrade.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants