Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

[FEATURE REQUEST] Create SBOM by using cyclonedx #4599

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jun 16, 2025
Merged

[FEATURE REQUEST] Create SBOM by using cyclonedx #4599

merged 10 commits into from
Jun 16, 2025

Conversation

@jesmrec
Copy link
Collaborator

@jesmrec jesmrec commented Jun 13, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Related Issues

App: #4598

  • Add changelog files for the fixed issues in folder changelog/unreleased. More info here
  • Add feature to Release Notes in ReleaseNotesViewModel.kt creating a new ReleaseNote() with String resources (if required)

QA

#4599 (comment)

@jesmrec jesmrec linked an issue Jun 13, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
[FEATURE REQUEST] SBOM generation #4598
Closed
10 tasks
github-advanced-security[bot]
github-advanced-security bot found potential problems Jun 13, 2025
View reviewed changes
@jesmrec jesmrec force-pushed the feature/integrate_sbom branch from 0627650 to fff8b08 Compare June 13, 2025 11:08
@jesmrec jesmrec marked this pull request as ready for review June 13, 2025 12:58
@jesmrec jesmrec requested a review from joragua June 13, 2025 12:58
@jesmrec jesmrec force-pushed the feature/integrate_sbom branch 2 times, most recently from 6ff4a3e to 7d85e11 Compare June 16, 2025 07:35
@joragua joragua changed the title Create SBOM by using cyclonedx [FEATURE REQUEST] Create SBOM by using cyclonedx Jun 16, 2025
joragua
joragua approved these changes Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@joragua joragua left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Let's move it to QA 🚀

@joragua
Copy link
Collaborator

joragua commented Jun 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

I've finished the QA round and it's approved on my side! Good job @jesmrec 💯

  • Working locally
  • Working in CI
  • HTML well-formed

@jesmrec jesmrec force-pushed the feature/integrate_sbom branch from 9ba88f1 to 0a074b3 Compare June 16, 2025 11:53
@jesmrec jesmrec merged commit 747e9e0 into master Jun 16, 2025
9 checks passed
@jesmrec jesmrec deleted the feature/integrate_sbom branch June 16, 2025 12:07
@felix-schwarz felix-schwarz mentioned this pull request Jun 27, 2025
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@joragua joragua joragua approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

Approved by qa

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[FEATURE REQUEST] SBOM generation

4 participants

@jesmrec @joragua @ownclouders