Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@micbar
Copy link
Contributor

@micbar micbar commented Dec 29, 2021

Description

Merge back the release branch after successful release

Related Issue

  • Fixes <issue_link>

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

  • test environment:
  • test case 1:
  • test case 2:
  • ...

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Database schema changes (next release will require increase of minor version instead of patch)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Technical debt
  • Tests only (no source changes)

Checklist:

  • Code changes
  • Unit tests added
  • Acceptance tests added
  • Documentation ticket raised:
  • Changelog item, see TEMPLATE

@micbar micbar requested a review from jnweiger December 29, 2021 09:18
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

100.0% 100.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@owncloud owncloud deleted a comment from update-docs bot Jan 12, 2022
@phil-davis phil-davis mentioned this pull request Jan 12, 2022
11 tasks
@phil-davis
Copy link
Contributor

@jnweiger @micbar I made PR #39684 as an alternative to trying to sort out the conflicts in this merge-back PR.
The "real" code has already been forward-ported into master anyway, so in reality there are not many changes that still need to be applied to master.

@phil-davis
Copy link
Contributor

@micbar @jnweiger PR #39684 added all the real changes from here into master.

IMO this PR can be closed.

@micbar micbar closed this Jan 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants