⚡ Bolt: Optimize list_work performance#17
⚡ Bolt: Optimize list_work performance#17google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
list_work performance#17Conversation
…ls with shell parameter expansion and builtins. This reduced execution time for 50 items from ~577ms to ~11ms (a 98% reduction). Additionally, I fixed a bug where `list_work` would fail with `set -u` if no arguments were provided.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
💡 What: Replaced external process spawns (
basename,sed,grep) inlist_workloop with shell builtins (${var##*/},${var:offset},read).🎯 Why: Process spawning inside a loop is expensive (N+1 problem). This caused
list_workto be slow (~10ms per item).📊 Impact: Reduced
list_worktime by ~98% (577ms -> 11ms for 50 items).🔬 Measurement: Verified with
benchmark_work_manager.shscript (created and deleted during process). Validated withtests/unit/test_work_manager.bats.PR created automatically by Jules for task 6457147374929505319 started by @oyi77