Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@atxtechbro
Copy link
Owner

Git Statistics

2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

🎯 Overview

This PR transforms the post-PR mini retro from a 3-line stub into a comprehensive procedure that enables effective retrospectives and continuous improvement.

🚀 Key Changes

Formalized Retro Procedure

The new post-pr-mini-retro.md includes:

  • Agent-led collaborative process - Clear steps for how agents should drive retros
  • Comprehensive question categories:
    • What worked well
    • What didn't work as expected
    • Procedure adherence
    • Systems improvement opportunities
    • Formatting overhead check
    • Tool boundary clarity
    • Principle tensions

Enhanced /retro Command

Updated to inject both:

  • The full retro procedure
  • The continuous improvement principle

✨ Notable Features

Agent-Led Process

Clear guidance for agents to:

  1. Create a retro plan
  2. Invite human participation
  3. Lead with substance
  4. Foster collaborative discussion

New Question Categories

  • Formatting overhead check - Permission to flag unnecessary precision requirements
  • Tool boundary clarity - Identify tools needing clearer descriptions
  • Principle tensions - Analyze competing principles in decision-making

Personality-Driven Focus

Support for consultant personalities (Jonah, Brent) to provide specific lenses for retros.

🎭 Principles Applied

  • systems-stewardship: Single source of truth for retro procedures
  • continuous-improvement: Wring out every drop of learning
  • snowball-method: 20% systems work enables 80% feature work

Closes #1102

…stions

Transform 3-line stub into comprehensive retro procedure with:
- Agent-led collaborative process
- Detailed retro questions covering all aspects
- Formatting overhead and tool boundary checks
- Principle tension analysis
- Personality-driven focus (Jonah, Brent, etc.)

Update /retro command to inject full procedure alongside principle.

Closes #1102

Principle: systems-stewardship
@amazon-q-developer
Copy link
Contributor

⏳ I'm reviewing this pull request for security vulnerabilities and code quality issues. I'll provide an update when I'm done

@amazon-q-developer
Copy link
Contributor

✅ I finished the code review, and didn't find any security or code quality issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Formalize Post-PR Mini Retro procedure in knowledge/procedures

2 participants