Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@tbssajal
Copy link
Contributor

@tbssajal tbssajal commented Oct 28, 2024

  • Implemented auto-bonding by increasing LNTN conversion ratio
  • Tests for auto-bonding

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 72.99%. Comparing base (6ef2894) to head (8c096d2).
Report is 82 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1059      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    72.97%   72.99%   +0.03%     
===========================================
  Files           27       29       +2     
  Lines         3281     4580    +1299     
===========================================
+ Hits          2394     3343     +949     
- Misses         692      951     +259     
- Partials       195      286      +91     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@ScottRMalley ScottRMalley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We might want to add some new tests to double check this, otherwise I think it's looking pretty good.

@tbssajal tbssajal force-pushed the auto-bonding-inflation-reward branch 2 times, most recently from 3f0b03b to da45371 Compare October 30, 2024 18:38
@tbssajal tbssajal marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2024 18:41
Copy link
Contributor

@vpiyush vpiyush left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM now.

@tbssajal tbssajal force-pushed the auto-bonding-inflation-reward branch from da45371 to 59f9adb Compare November 5, 2024 16:39
@tbssajal
Copy link
Contributor Author

tbssajal commented Nov 5, 2024

I had to do a bit of refactoring due to the fact that there are multiple protocol contracts that distribute rewards. Please review again if you have already reviewed @vpiyush @ScottRMalley @Jason-Zhangxin-Chen @lorenzo-dev1 @yazzaoui .

@tbssajal tbssajal requested a review from vpiyush November 6, 2024 02:21
@lorenzo-dev1 lorenzo-dev1 mentioned this pull request Nov 6, 2024
39 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@lorenzo-dev1 lorenzo-dev1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a couple of questions, but LGTM!

@ScottRMalley ScottRMalley force-pushed the auto-bonding-inflation-reward branch from dca4c50 to 3fc51cf Compare November 11, 2024 18:03
@ScottRMalley ScottRMalley force-pushed the auto-bonding-inflation-reward branch from 60c59dd to eac476d Compare November 14, 2024 13:06
@ScottRMalley ScottRMalley merged commit a72e4d5 into develop Nov 15, 2024
88 of 89 checks passed
@ScottRMalley ScottRMalley deleted the auto-bonding-inflation-reward branch November 15, 2024 09:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants