Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@draftcode
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@draftcode draftcode requested a review from a team as a code owner October 30, 2025 04:16
@aviator-app
Copy link
Contributor

aviator-app bot commented Oct 30, 2025

Current Aviator status

Aviator will automatically update this comment as the status of the PR changes.
Comment /aviator refresh to force Aviator to re-examine your PR (or learn about other /aviator commands).

This PR was merged using Aviator.

Stack

  1. 👉 Handle a case where no branch was chosen #618 👈 (this pr)

See the real-time status of this PR on the Aviator webapp.
Use the Aviator Chrome Extension to see the status of your PR within GitHub.

@aviator-app
Copy link
Contributor

aviator-app bot commented Oct 30, 2025

✅ FlexReview Status

Common Owner: aviator-co/engineering (expert-load-balance assignment)
Owner and Assignment:

  • aviator-co/engineering (expert-load-balance assignment)
    Owned Files
    • 🔒 cmd/av/adopt.go

Review SLO: 7 business hours if PR size is <= 200 LOC for the first response.

@aviator-app aviator-app bot requested a review from simsinght October 30, 2025 04:16
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @draftcode, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the av adopt command by introducing a specific handler for situations where a user opts not to select any branches during the adoption process. Instead of proceeding with an empty selection, which could lead to unexpected behavior, the system now detects this case, informs the user that no branches were adopted, and then performs a clean exit. This change improves the robustness and user-friendliness of the command.

Highlights

  • Error Handling: Implemented a new check within the initGitFetch function to specifically handle the scenario where no branches are selected for adoption, preventing potential errors.
  • User Experience: When no branches are chosen, the application now displays a clear 'No branch adopted' success message and gracefully exits, providing better feedback to the user.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly handles the case where no branches are selected for adoption in the remote adoption flow. This is a good improvement as it prevents an unnecessary git fetch operation and provides clear feedback to the user, making the behavior consistent with the local adoption flow. I have one suggestion to improve maintainability by reducing code duplication.

Comment on lines +353 to +358
if len(chosenTargets) == 0 {
return tea.Batch(
vm.AddView(uiutils.SimpleMessageView{Message: colors.SuccessStyle.Render("✓ No branch adopted")}),
tea.Quit,
)
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This logic for handling an empty chosenTargets slice is also present in (vm *adoptViewModel) initAdoption (lines 228-233). To improve maintainability and avoid code duplication, consider extracting this block into a private helper function within this file.

For example:

func noBranchesAdopted(adder func(tea.Model) tea.Cmd) tea.Cmd {
	return tea.Batch(
		adder(uiutils.SimpleMessageView{Message: colors.SuccessStyle.Render("✓ No branch adopted")}),
		tea.Quit,
	)
}

And then call it like return noBranchesAdopted(vm.AddView) in both places.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants