Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Extract MergeCommit for remote branches #619

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
draftcode wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Extract MergeCommit for remote branches #619

draftcode wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@draftcode
Copy link
Contributor

@draftcode draftcode commented Oct 30, 2025

No description provided.

@draftcode draftcode requested a review from a team as a code owner October 30, 2025 04:38
@aviator-app
Copy link
Contributor

aviator-app bot commented Oct 30, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Current Aviator status

Aviator will automatically update this comment as the status of the PR changes.
Comment /aviator refresh to force Aviator to re-examine your PR (or learn about other /aviator commands).

This PR was merged using Aviator.

Stack

  1. 👉 Extract MergeCommit for remote branches #619 👈 (this pr)
See the real-time status of this PR on the Aviator webapp.
Use the Aviator Chrome Extension to see the status of your PR within GitHub.

@aviator-app
Copy link
Contributor

aviator-app bot commented Oct 30, 2025 •
edited
Loading

✅ FlexReview Status

Common Owner: aviator-co/engineering (expert-load-balance assignment)
Owner and Assignment:

  • ✅ aviator-co/engineering (expert-load-balance assignment)
    Owned Files
    • 🔒 internal/actions/get_remote_stacked_pr.go

Review SLO: 7 business hours if PR size is <= 200 LOC for the first response.

@aviator-app aviator-app bot requested a review from simsinght October 30, 2025 04:38
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

gemini-code-assist bot commented Oct 30, 2025

Summary of Changes

Hello @draftcode, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a significant enhancement to how remote pull request information is handled by incorporating the merge commit hash directly into the RemotePRInfo data structure. This change aims to provide more comprehensive details about remote branches, specifically by making the merge commit readily accessible, which can be beneficial for various internal operations or for displaying more complete PR status.

Highlights

  • Data Structure Enhancement: The RemotePRInfo struct has been updated to include a new MergeCommit field, which will store the merge commit hash for remote pull requests.
  • Merge Commit Extraction: The logic for fetching remote PR information now extracts and populates the MergeCommit field using the pr.GetMergeCommit() method, ensuring this data is available.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

gemini-code-assist[bot]
gemini-code-assist bot reviewed Oct 30, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a MergeCommit field to the RemotePRInfo struct, which is populated when fetching remote stacked pull requests. The change is straightforward and correctly implemented. It aligns with the goal of extracting merge commit information for remote branches, likely to improve synchronization of local branch metadata. The code is clean and I have no issues to report.

@aviator-app aviator-app bot closed this in e3a2206 Oct 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tulioz tulioz tulioz approved these changes

@simsinght simsinght Awaiting requested review from simsinght

+1 more reviewer

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist[bot] gemini-code-assist[bot] left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

merged-by-mq

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@draftcode @tulioz