-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 189
[Schedule Module] add new schedule module into Loris #6150
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
johnsaigle
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Small review. Some of the code needs changing to meet the core LORIS standards.
I'm not really sure what's going on with the new classes being added that deal with SQL statements. It seems unusual for LORIS
|
@johnsaigle Thanks for your reviews. |
|
restart travis |
|
This PR can't start Travis. I will reopen it. |
|
restart travis |
a948c9e to
a2c99fb
Compare
|
@zaliqarosli Could you test this module? |
zaliqarosli
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this all looks really good! there's just a space missing in the sql patch, and some php lines may still fail travis
i will approve review once they're resolved!
zaliqarosli
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
re-review after testing the front end
modules/schedule_module/php/schedulemoduleprovisioner.class.inc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
3a7732d to
604335e
Compare
|
@kongtiaowang I have tested the PR and everything looks good except for one thing:
|
|
All looks good but on the |
|
@GeorgeMurad visit is good now. |
GeorgeMurad
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
This is a test to see if merging aces#6150 caused tests to fail. All tests were passing on the PR, but it was an old enough PR that it's possible that the static check rules were changed in the interm.
Brief summary of changes
Rewrite this module from IBIS.
Testing instructions
Test plan
