Typescript strict mode #8950
Merged
Typescript strict mode #8950
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
laemtl
approved these changes
Nov 14, 2023
laemtl
reviewed
Nov 14, 2023
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
| { | |||
| "strict": false | |||
laemtl
approved these changes
Nov 14, 2023
Closed
jeffersoncasimir
pushed a commit
to jeffersoncasimir/Loris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 29, 2024
This enable strict mode in our TypeScript config so that we will catch as many errors as possible. The config is overloaded for the EEG Browser to disable it because the EEG browser doesn't currently passed, but this should be a short term solution.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This enable strict mode in our TypeScript config so that we will catch as many errors as possible. The config is overloaded for the EEG Browser to disable it because the EEG browser doesn't currently passed, but this should be a short term solution.