Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@Lancetnik
Copy link
Member

Just a little codebase improvements with too old deprecations and useless python version comparisions removing

Checks

@Lancetnik Lancetnik requested a review from qingyun-wu August 20, 2025 18:54
Copy link
Collaborator

@qingyun-wu qingyun-wu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks!

@qingyun-wu qingyun-wu added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 20, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 607c7d9 Aug 20, 2025
17 checks passed
@qingyun-wu qingyun-wu deleted the chore/remove-deprecations branch August 20, 2025 19:19
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 20, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
autogen/agentchat/conversable_agent.py 63.67% <ø> (-1.71%) ⬇️
autogen/cache/abstract_cache_base.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
autogen/cache/disk_cache.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
autogen/cache/in_memory_cache.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
autogen/cache/redis_cache.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
autogen/coding/docker_commandline_code_executor.py 82.14% <100.00%> (+34.59%) ⬆️
autogen/coding/jupyter/docker_jupyter_server.py 38.88% <100.00%> (-2.45%) ⬇️
autogen/coding/jupyter/jupyter_client.py 39.02% <100.00%> (-49.08%) ⬇️
autogen/coding/jupyter/jupyter_code_executor.py 30.48% <100.00%> (-56.58%) ⬇️
autogen/coding/jupyter/local_jupyter_server.py 35.71% <100.00%> (-32.35%) ⬇️
... and 3 more

... and 29 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants