Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@samueldr
Copy link
Contributor

@samueldr samueldr commented Sep 16, 2025

(as requested by @piegamesde)

Signed-off-by: Samuel Dionne-Riel <[email protected]>
@andir
Copy link
Owner

andir commented Sep 16, 2025

Will this work? Whenever I use lix locally for either of my things it just crashes in different ways from CppNix... Can't wait for a proper rewrite of this crap.

@samueldr
Copy link
Contributor Author

samueldr commented Sep 17, 2025

Will this work?

What's “this” here?

Lix will work just as well as Nix for CI purposes. I mean, the action passed after all.

The installer action has been working without a hitch since I made the action. Even through the updates of the underlying Lix.

This AFAICT won't change any of the test semantics, as the shell already defines a specific Nix-compatible runtime to use, and all "imperative" checks use nix-shell.

I should maybe have added the mention “as requested by @piegamesde elsewhere”, to the PR body. I thought they would have handled the PR quickly earlier today, so I left the PR body empty, sorry.

@andir andir merged commit 208112c into andir:master Sep 17, 2025
1 check passed
@andir
Copy link
Owner

andir commented Sep 17, 2025

lets give it a try :-)

@samueldr samueldr deleted the ci/lix-gha branch September 17, 2025 23:08
@eclairevoyant
Copy link
Contributor

Lix will work just as well as Nix for CI purposes

At present, Lix is slower and uses more memory. Don't understand the point of this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants