Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Comments

Filter sequence to int because any models skip rule checks#10221

Merged
abnegate merged 2 commits into1.7.xfrom
fix-sequence-type
Jul 29, 2025
Merged

Filter sequence to int because any models skip rule checks#10221
abnegate merged 2 commits into1.7.xfrom
fix-sequence-type

Conversation

@abnegate
Copy link
Member

What does this PR do?

  • Fixes issue where sequence is not set to int in responses

Test Plan

(Write your test plan here. If you changed any code, please provide us with clear instructions on how you verified your changes work. Screenshots may also be helpful.)

Related PRs and Issues

  • (Related PR or issue)

Checklist

  • Have you read the Contributing Guidelines on issues?
  • If the PR includes a change to an API's metadata (desc, label, params, etc.), does it also include updated API specs and example docs?

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 29, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This change updates the filter method in the Document class to ensure that the $sequence attribute of a DatabaseDocument is explicitly cast to an integer. If $sequence is not present, it defaults to 0. The method continues to remove the $collection and $tenant attributes and recursively filters nested DatabaseDocument attributes. Additionally, a new assertion is added to the testCreateDocument method in the end-to-end tests to verify that the $sequence field in the created document's body is of integer type.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • Feat expose sequence #9870: Both PRs modify the filter method in the Document class to handle the $sequence attribute, with this PR adding explicit integer casting and the related PR adding the attribute rule and removing its removal from filtering.
  • Removed $sequence from response through response filters #10115: This PR casts the $sequence attribute to an integer, while the related PR introduces a response filter that removes the $sequence field entirely from document responses, both addressing the $sequence field but in functionally different ways.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5924434 and 360e4ce.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/Appwrite/Utopia/Response/Model/Document.php (1 hunks)
  • tests/e2e/Services/Databases/DatabasesBase.php (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: abnegate
PR: appwrite/appwrite#9743
File: src/Appwrite/Utopia/Request.php:33-36
Timestamp: 2025-05-12T06:05:27.133Z
Learning: In Appwrite's architecture, the Request class should only filter parameters when filters are explicitly registered. If no filters are present, all parameters should be passed through, and the route action is responsible for validating which parameters are present/valid.
Learnt from: ItzNotABug
PR: appwrite/appwrite#9669
File: src/Appwrite/Utopia/Request/Filters/V19.php:56-71
Timestamp: 2025-05-03T05:58:34.294Z
Learning: According to the developer, wildcard select handling in V19 request filter is only needed for `listDocuments` operations, not for `getDocument` operations, despite the doc-block mentioning both.
src/Appwrite/Utopia/Response/Model/Document.php (1)

Learnt from: ItzNotABug
PR: #9669
File: src/Appwrite/Utopia/Request/Filters/V19.php:56-71
Timestamp: 2025-05-03T05:58:34.294Z
Learning: According to the developer, wildcard select handling in V19 request filter is only needed for listDocuments operations, not for getDocument operations, despite the doc-block mentioning both.

🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
tests/e2e/Services/Databases/DatabasesBase.php (1)
tests/e2e/Services/Databases/DatabasesCustomServerTest.php (1)
  • testBulkUpsert (4680-4871)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: Setup & Build Appwrite Image
  • GitHub Check: Setup & Build Appwrite Image
  • GitHub Check: scan
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/Appwrite/Utopia/Response/Model/Document.php (1)

82-82: LGTM! Explicit integer casting ensures type consistency.

The addition of explicit integer casting for the $sequence attribute aligns perfectly with the PR objective to ensure sequence values are properly typed. This change ensures that even if the underlying database returns the sequence as a string or other type, the response model will consistently return it as an integer, which matches the TYPE_INTEGER rule definition on lines 39-44.

The implementation correctly uses the existing attribute value with a fallback to 0 (matching the rule's default), then casts it to integer.

tests/e2e/Services/Databases/DatabasesBase.php (1)

1660-1660: LGTM! Good test coverage for sequence type validation.

This assertion properly validates that the $sequence field is cast to an integer type, which aligns with the backend changes to ensure sequence values are properly typed. The test follows good practice by first checking existence (line 1659) then validating the specific type requirement.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix-sequence-type

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions
Copy link

Security Scan Results for PR

Docker Image Scan Results

Package Version Vulnerability Severity
binutils 2.42-r0 CVE-2025-0840 HIGH
git 2.45.3-r0 CVE-2025-48384 HIGH
git 2.45.3-r0 CVE-2025-48385 HIGH
git-init-template 2.45.3-r0 CVE-2025-48384 HIGH
git-init-template 2.45.3-r0 CVE-2025-48385 HIGH
icu 74.2-r0 CVE-2025-5222 HIGH
icu-data-en 74.2-r0 CVE-2025-5222 HIGH
icu-dev 74.2-r0 CVE-2025-5222 HIGH
icu-libs 74.2-r0 CVE-2025-5222 HIGH
libexpat 2.6.4-r0 CVE-2024-8176 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2024-56171 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2025-24928 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2025-27113 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2025-32414 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2025-32415 HIGH
pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2024-12718 HIGH
pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4138 HIGH
pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4330 HIGH
pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4517 HIGH
python3 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2024-12718 HIGH
python3 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4138 HIGH
python3 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4330 HIGH
python3 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4517 HIGH
python3-pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2024-12718 HIGH
python3-pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4138 HIGH
python3-pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4330 HIGH
python3-pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4517 HIGH
python3-pycache-pyc0 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2024-12718 HIGH
python3-pycache-pyc0 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4138 HIGH
python3-pycache-pyc0 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4330 HIGH
python3-pycache-pyc0 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4517 HIGH
sqlite-libs 3.45.3-r1 CVE-2025-29087 HIGH
xz 5.6.2-r0 CVE-2025-31115 HIGH
xz-libs 5.6.2-r0 CVE-2025-31115 HIGH
golang.org/x/crypto v0.31.0 CVE-2025-22869 HIGH
golang.org/x/oauth2 v0.24.0 CVE-2025-22868 HIGH

Source Code Scan Results

🎉 No vulnerabilities found!

@github-actions
Copy link

✨ Benchmark results

  • Requests per second: 928
  • Requests with 200 status code: 167,126
  • P99 latency: 0.193782354

⚡ Benchmark Comparison

Metric This PR Latest version
RPS 928 934
200 167,126 168,111
P99 0.193782354 0.210233212

@abnegate abnegate requested a review from stnguyen90 July 29, 2025 05:19
@abnegate abnegate merged commit f89e468 into 1.7.x Jul 29, 2025
69 of 70 checks passed
@abnegate abnegate deleted the fix-sequence-type branch July 29, 2025 05:56
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2025
2 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 10, 2025
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants