/*
* =====================================================================================
*
* Filename: patch_evaluator.c
*
* Description: A simple program to simulate the evaluation process for a
* kernel development request, based on established principles.
*
* Version: 1.0
* Created: 2025-08-15
* Revision: none
* Compiler: gcc
*
* Author: Linus Torvalds (Persona)
* Organization: The Linux Foundation
*
* =====================================================================================
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <string.h>
// "Good taste" means simple, clear data structures.
// No over-engineering.
// --- DATA STRUCTURES ---
// Represents the initial triage of a request.
typedef struct {
bool is_real_problem;
bool is_simplest_way;
bool breaks_anything; // To be determined
} InitialCheck;
// Represents the final analysis and proposed solution.
typedef struct {
const char* core_judgment;
const char* insight_data_structure;
const char* insight_complexity;
const char* insight_risk;
const char* solution_step_1;
const char* solution_step_2;
const char* solution_step_3;
const char* solution_step_4;
} FinalDecision;
// Represents a code review.
typedef enum {
TASTE_GOOD,
TASTE_MEH,
TASTE_GARBAGE
} TasteScore;
typedef struct {
TasteScore score;
const char* fatal_flaw;
const char* improvement_direction;
} CodeReview;
// The main object representing the request.
typedef struct {
const char* id;
InitialCheck initial_check;
FinalDecision final_decision;
CodeReview code_review;
} KernelRequest;
// --- FUNCTIONS ---
/*
* Fills the initial check data. In a real scenario, this would involve
* mailing list discussions. Here, we just populate it.
* Pragmatism: Solve the problem, don't just talk about it.
*/
void perform_initial_check(KernelRequest* req)
{
printf("--- Linus's 3 Initial Questions for Request '%s' ---\n", req->id);
// 1. Is this a real problem or imaginary?
req->initial_check.is_real_problem = true;
printf("1. Is this a real problem or imaginary? -> Assumed real.\n");
// 2. Is there a simpler way?
req->initial_check.is_simplest_way = true; // For now.
printf("2. Is there a simpler way? -> Assumed this is the initial proposal.\n");
// 3. Will it break anything?
req->initial_check.breaks_anything = false; // To be determined
printf("3. Will it break anything? -> To be determined by analysis.\n");
printf("--- Initial check passed. Proceeding with analysis. ---\n\n");
}
/*
* Fills the final decision data. This is the core of the technical evaluation.
* Keep functions short. This one just populates a struct.
*/
void make_final_decision(KernelRequest* req)
{
req->final_decision.core_judgment = "✅ 值得做: It addresses a documented performance bottleneck in file I/O.";
req->final_decision.insight_data_structure = "The key is the VFS inode cache. It's currently contended.";
req->final_decision.insight_complexity = "The proposed locking scheme is too complex. Can be simplified.";
req->final_decision.insight_risk = "High risk of deadlocks if not implemented carefully. Race conditions in user-space file access.";
req->final_decision.solution_step_1 = "Simplify the data structure: Use a per-CPU cache line to reduce lock contention.";
req->final_decision.solution_step_2 = "Eliminate special cases for read/write paths.";
req->final_decision.solution_step_3 = "Implement with a simple, coarse-grained lock first. Prove it works, then optimize.";
req->final_decision.solution_step_4 = "Ensure zero user-space API changes."; // "Never break userspace"
}
/*
* Simulates a code review.
* Bad code is obvious. Good code is boring.
*/
void perform_code_review(KernelRequest* req)
{
req->code_review.score = TASTE_GARBAGE;
req->code_review.fatal_flaw = "You have more than 3 levels of indentation. Your logic is broken.";
req->code_review.improvement_direction = "\"Your data structure is wrong. Refactor the data to eliminate the conditions that lead to this nesting. This 20-line function should be 5 lines.\"";
}
// --- MAIN EXECUTION ---
int main(void)
{
// Initialize the request based on the prompt.
KernelRequest req001 = { .id = "REQ-001" };
// Step 1: Perform the initial check.
perform_initial_check(&req001);
// Step 2: Make the final decision and plan.
make_final_decision(&req001);
// Step 3: Review the (hypothetical) submitted code.
perform_code_review(&req001);
// --- Print the final results ---
printf("==================================================\n");
printf(" LINUS'S FINAL DECISION\n");
printf("==================================================\n");
printf("【核心判断】\n%s\n\n", req001.final_decision.core_judgment);
printf("【关键洞察】\n");
printf("- 数据结构: %s\n", req001.final_decision.insight_data_structure);
printf("- 复杂度: %s\n", req001.final_decision.insight_complexity);
printf("- 风险点: %s\n\n", req001.final_decision.insight_risk);
printf("【Linus式方案】\n");
printf("1. %s\n", req001.final_decision.solution_step_1);
printf("2. %s\n", req001.final_decision.solution_step_2);
printf("3. %s\n", req001.final_decision.solution_step_3);
printf("4. %s\n", req001.final_decision.solution_step_4);
printf("==================================================\n\n");
printf("==================================================\n");
printf(" LINUS'S CODE REVIEW\n");
printf("==================================================\n");
printf("【品味评分】\n");
if (req001.code_review.score == TASTE_GARBAGE) {
printf("🔴 垃圾\n\n");
}
printf("【致命问题】\n- %s\n\n", req001.code_review.fatal_flaw);
printf("【改进方向】\n%s\n", req001.code_review.improvement_direction);
printf("==================================================\n");
return 0;
}
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
aresbit/cc
Folders and files
| Name | Name | Last commit message | Last commit date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Repository files navigation
About
No description, website, or topics provided.
Resources
Stars
Watchers
Forks
Releases
No releases published
Packages 0
No packages published