Scripts and input files for sensitivity analysis of msbr design #48
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
update local repository
Contributor
|
Hello @mehmeturkmen! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:
Comment last updated at 2020-10-24 21:28:36 UTC |
andrewryh
approved these changes
Oct 7, 2020
Contributor
andrewryh
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice job!
See my comments
Co-authored-by: Andrei Rykhlevskii <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andrei Rykhlevskii <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR holds python scripts, dakota/saltproc/serpent input files for the milestone 2.3 in Meitner project related to the sensitivity analysis. The files in this PR prepared to test the load-following capability of msbr design at the beginning of life which uses a total gas removal efficiency of 0.5.
@katyhuff Any suggestions for potential reviewers in this PR like Alvin Lee?