-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
rock-3a: unset BOOTFS_TYPE for non-vendor builds
#9068
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughRemoved the BOOTFS_TYPE="fat" definition from the Rock 3A board configuration file ( Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Disabled knowledge base sources:
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
WalkthroughA single-line configuration change to the Rock 3A board configuration file that unsets the BOOTFS_TYPE variable after an informational alert in the mainline U-Boot configuration function, altering variable state for subsequent configuration steps. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Disabled knowledge base sources:
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🧠 Learnings (16)📓 Common learnings📚 Learning: 2025-11-02T20:49:56.719ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-09-12T19:28:38.491ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-09-14T06:32:29.806ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-12-13T11:38:58.965ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-10-26T10:41:35.118ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-10-05T19:31:16.930ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-09-07T17:39:32.272ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-12-13T11:44:54.545ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-07-17T04:12:33.125ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-11-20T18:20:11.985ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-10-14T05:08:11.785ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-08-02T05:46:10.664ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-06-04T23:45:38.860ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-11-10T22:05:40.490ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-09-14T06:29:18.958ZApplied to files:
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Don't think it's needed even for vendor u-boot anymore -- it was at the very first versions of vendor. I say this cos if you |
|
I see. |
Yes, the very first vendor uboot is from sdk with 4.19 kernel, and now the vendor uboot has get updated to the same repo as rk3588, so it should be unnecessary to set a fat boot partition. |
following recommendations from Jianfeng and Ricardo
Description
Perhaps needed for
vendor, did not test. However mainline just works fine from ext4.How Has This Been Tested?
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.