Merged
Conversation
Co-authored by: [email protected]; Signed-off-by: ffgan <[email protected]>
alexeagle
approved these changes
Dec 9, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Recently, riscv64 has been widely adopted, and we can consider adding riscv64 support to
jq.bzl.Our upstream
jqandbuildifier_prebuiltboth provide support for riscv64, so we only need minimal modifications to add riscv64 support tojq.bzl.I ran CI in my fork, and the results show everything went smoothly. Please see the details:
Of course, the CI does not include testing for riscv64. I tested it on my riscv64 server, and the results also show everything went smoothly.
If you have any questions about the above, please feel free to @ me, and I'll be happy to answer all questions.
Other Info
Co-authored by: [email protected];