Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

chore(coderabbit): dont review generated files #7172

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2025
Merged

chore(coderabbit): dont review generated files #7172

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2025

Conversation

@Jayllyz
Copy link
Contributor

@Jayllyz Jayllyz commented Aug 10, 2025

Summary

Ignore generated files for Coderabbit

Test Plan

N/A

Docs

N/A

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Aug 10, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: b5e91cc

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 10, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

A new path_filters entry has been introduced under the reviews section in the .coderabbit.yaml configuration file. This entry specifies glob patterns to include all files by default but explicitly excludes files and directories such as those under generated/, several Rust source files, a JSON schema, and a TypeScript file. No changes were made to any exported or public code entities; the update is limited to configuration.

Possibly related PRs

  • chore: add CodeRabbit config #7114: Introduced the initial CodeRabbit configuration file, laying the groundwork for subsequent .coderabbit.yaml modifications including path filters.

Suggested reviewers

  • siketyan
  • dyc3

Note

🔌 MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available in Early Access!

Pro users can now connect to remote MCP servers under the Integrations page to get reviews and chat conversations that understand additional development context.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b5e91cc and 99af763.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Aug 10, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.coderabbit.yaml (1)

15-15: Improve readability: switch to a multiline list.

Easier to maintain and review diffs when patterns change.

-  path_filters: ["**", "!**/generated/**", "!**/biome_unicode_table/src/tables.rs", "!**/migrate/eslint_any_rule_to_biome.rs", "!**/nursery.rs", "!**/categories.rs", "!**/rules.rs", "!**/configuration_schema.json", "!**/backend-jsonrpc/src/workspace.ts"]
+  path_filters:
+    - "**"
+    - "!**/generated/**"
+    - "!**/biome_unicode_table/src/tables.rs"
+    - "!**/migrate/eslint_any_rule_to_biome.rs"
+    - "!**/nursery.rs"
+    - "!**/categories.rs"
+    - "!**/rules.rs"
+    - "!**/configuration_schema.json"
+    - "!**/backend-jsonrpc/src/workspace.ts"
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 58f8102 and b5e91cc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.coderabbit.yaml (2)

15-15: Path filters look correct and schema-compliant.

Includes everything, then excludes known generated artefacts. Nice and tidy.

15-15: Manual verification needed: confirm excluded paths

The sandbox couldn’t show which files are actually dropped by your filters. Please run this locally and share the results:

git ls-files \
  | grep -E '(^|/)(generated/|biome_unicode_table/src/tables\.rs|migrate/eslint_any_rule_to_biome\.rs|nursery\.rs|categories\.rs|rules\.rs|configuration_schema\.json|backend-jsonrpc/src/workspace\.ts)$'

That’ll list everything your !… patterns exclude so we can be sure nothing critical slips through.

dyc3
dyc3 approved these changes Aug 10, 2025
View reviewed changes
@Jayllyz Jayllyz force-pushed the chore/rabbit-path-filters branch from b5e91cc to 99af763 Compare August 10, 2025 17:47
@ematipico ematipico merged commit 51558a5 into biomejs:main Aug 10, 2025
3 checks passed
@Jayllyz Jayllyz deleted the chore/rabbit-path-filters branch August 10, 2025 18:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

@ematipico ematipico ematipico approved these changes

@dyc3 dyc3 dyc3 approved these changes

@siketyan siketyan siketyan approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@Jayllyz @ematipico @dyc3 @siketyan