You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.
This PR includes no changesets
When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types
A new configuration block, finishing_touches, has been introduced to .coderabbit.yaml with a nested docstrings.enabled option set to false. This is a feature toggle distinct from existing configuration structures. No modifications have been made to existing logic—this is purely a structural addition to enable future docstring-related functionality.
Suggested reviewers
dyc3
siketyan
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name
Status
Explanation
Title check
✅ Passed
The title accurately and concisely describes the main change: disabling the docstrings feature in CodeRabbit configuration.
Description check
✅ Passed
The description relates to the changeset by explaining the rationale for disabling docstrings, though it's brief and uses a template.
Docstring Coverage
✅ Passed
No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Create PR with unit tests
Post copyable unit tests in a comment
Commit unit tests in branch chore/disable-docstrings
📜 Recent review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c9d5df8 and 4266d3e.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.coderabbit.yaml (3)
27-27: Verify base_branches change is intentional.
This modification to auto_review.base_branches appears to be beyond the scope of disabling docstrings. Could you confirm this is a deliberate change or a collateral modification?
34-36: Docstrings feature toggle added correctly.
The new finishing_touches.docstrings.enabled: false configuration correctly disables docstring generation and aligns with the PR objective. The structure matches the schema and follows the established pattern for feature toggles.
41-41: Verify filePatterns change is intentional.
The modification to knowledge_base.code_guidelines.filePatterns (now including only **/CLAUDE.md and **/CONTRIBUTING.md) falls outside the stated PR scope. Is this a deliberate change, or would you like to revert it to stay focused on disabling docstrings?
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
We internally agreed to diable the feature because it doesn't work very well
Test Plan
CodeRabbit should still work
Docs