Claude finished @matt-livefront's task —— View job

Code Review Complete

Summary of Changes

This PR fixes a flaky test in test_perform_search_totpExpired by correcting the race condition between repository value updates and state value updates. The fix changes both the waitFor condition and the assertion to check the same value (state), eliminating the timing issue.

Files Changed: 1 file

• AuthenticatorShared/UI/Vault/ItemList/ItemList/ItemListProcessorTests.swift (+4/-3)

Critical Issues

None found. The fix correctly addresses the race condition.

Suggested Improvements

1. Consider using waitForAsync for consistency

Location: ItemListProcessorTests.swift:449

The fix uses a closure-based waitFor condition, which is valid. However, the codebase shows a pattern of using waitForAsync for async conditions in several other tests in this file (lines 726, 777, 792, 793, 813, 828, etc.).

waitFor { subject.state.searchResults == [firstItemRefreshed] }

try await waitForAsync { self.subject.state.searchResults == [firstItemRefreshed] }

2. Test name could be more descriptive

Location: ItemListProcessorTests.swift:418

The test name test_perform_search_totpExpired could be more descriptive of what behavior it's verifying. Following the naming pattern in Testing.md (line 969-972), consider:

// Current:
func test_perform_search_totpExpired() throws

// More descriptive:
func test_perform_search_totpExpired_updatesSearchResults() throws

This makes it clearer at a glance that the test verifies search results are updated when TOTP codes expire.

Good Practices Observed

• Correctly identified and fixed the root cause of the race condition
• Changed both the wait condition and assertion to check the same source of truth
• Maintained test isolation and proper setup/teardown
• Added comprehensive assertions to verify both repository and state updates

Action Items

Optional (for author's consideration):

1. Consider if waitForAsync would be more consistent with other async tests in this file (though current fix is acceptable)
2. Consider renaming test to test_perform_search_totpExpired_updatesSearchResults for better clarity

No blocking issues - This PR is ready to merge as-is. The suggested improvements are minor stylistic considerations.

Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details – 290846ee-3c64-4108-8f41-bb259232de01

Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 47.11%. Comparing base (68feef3) to head (107ee8c).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2108       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   85.23%   47.11%   -38.13%     
===========================================
  Files        1709      530     -1179     
  Lines      145493    27298   -118195     
===========================================
- Hits       124011    12861   -111150     
+ Misses      21482    14437     -7045     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.