-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
Change the naming of the battlegroups #853
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes add a new Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip 📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.
Example instruction:
Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/unit-cards/battlegroup-card.tsx (1)
94-94: Consider fallback to uiParent.screenName for empty names.The
screen_namenow uses the newnamefield directly. If the battlegroup name is empty (due to missing or failed localization in mappingBattlegroups.ts line 63), this could result in a blank display.Consider adding a fallback:
- screen_name: name, + screen_name: name || uiParent.screenName,This ensures that if the new
namefield is empty, the UI falls back to the existinguiParent.screenNamevalue, maintaining backward compatibility.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
components/unit-cards/battlegroup-card.tsx(1 hunks)src/unitStats/battlegroup.ts(2 hunks)src/unitStats/mappingBattlegroups.ts(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
src/unitStats/mappingBattlegroups.ts (1)
src/unitStats/locstring.ts (1)
resolveLocstring(94-94)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: Build and run prettier
- GitHub Check: Deploy Web Preview
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/unitStats/battlegroup.ts (2)
57-57: LGTM: Clean type extension.The
namefield is properly typed and documented, following the existing code style.
135-135: LGTM: Field properly populated.The name is correctly passed through from the raw battlegroup data.
src/unitStats/mappingBattlegroups.ts (3)
13-13: LGTM: Type field added correctly.The
namefield follows the existing type structure and is properly documented.
39-39: LGTM: Initialization follows existing pattern.The empty string default is consistent with other field initializations in the same object.
63-63: I'll help you verify the concerns raised in this review comment. Let me start by examining the relevant code to understand the context and potential issues.
<function_calls>
#!/bin/bashFirst, let's understand the structure and find the files mentioned
echo "=== Finding relevant files ==="
find . -type f -name "mappingBattlegroups.ts" 2>/dev/null | head -20
find . -type f -name "battlegroup-card.tsx" 2>/dev/null | head -20
</function_calls>
<function_calls>
#!/bin/bashRead the mappingBattlegroups.ts file to see context around line 63
echo "=== Examining mappingBattlegroups.ts ==="
cat -n src/unitStats/mappingBattlegroups.ts | sed -n '1,80p'
</function_calls>
<function_calls>
#!/bin/bashFind and read the battlegroup-card.tsx file, especially around line 94
echo "=== Finding battlegroup-card.tsx ==="
find . -type f -name "battlegroup-card.tsx" 2>/dev/nullecho "=== Examining battlegroup-card.tsx ==="
if [ -f "src/components/battlegroup-card.tsx" ]; then
cat -n src/components/battlegroup-card.tsx | sed -n '80,110p'
fi
</function_calls>
<function_calls>
#!/bin/bashLet's search for where resolveLocstring is defined and what it does
echo "=== Finding resolveLocstring definition ==="
rg -n "resolveLocstring" --type=ts --type=tsx -B2 -A5 | head -50
</function_calls>
<function_calls>
#!/bin/bashSearch for uiParent usage and screenName to understand previous behavior
echo "=== Searching for uiParent and screenName usage ==="
rg -n "uiParent" --type=ts --type=tsx -C3 | head -80echo ""
echo "=== Searching for screenName usage ==="
rg -n "screenName" --type=ts --type=tsx -C2 | head -80
</function_calls>components/unit-cards/battlegroup-card.tsx (2)
86-86: LGTM: Clean destructuring.The
namefield is properly extracted from the resolved battlegroup data.
98-100: All new desc fields are correctly typed and match UnitUpgradeCard expectations.The three new fields (
brief_text,icon_name,brief_text_formatter) are all part of theUnitUpgradeDescriptiontype (defined inunit-upgrade-card.tsxlines 24-39):
brief_text: string | null— correctly assigneduiParent.briefTexticon_name: string— correctly assigneduiParent.iconNamebrief_text_formatter: string— correctly set to empty string""The desc object includes all required fields and matches the pattern used in
UnitUpgradeCard(lines 168-176) andConstructableCard(lines 190-197) in the same file. No type mismatches or missing fields.
|
🌐 Branch deployed as preview to: |
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.