As discussed offline, this would make more sense if we compressed across messages (as digests would likely be repeated many times). However, item-by-item compression in this context won't help much (or at all).

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.72%. Comparing base (bb26817) to head (27c6e31).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1488      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.72%   91.72%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         280      280              
  Lines       70616    70579      -37     
==========================================
- Hits        64776    64740      -36     
+ Misses       5840     5839       -1     

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bb26817...27c6e31. Read the comment docs.