Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Some important fixes are part of the release branch and I guess we're ready for a new release, right?

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

None

Special notes for your reviewer:

None

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. labels Jun 17, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 17, 2020
@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

/test launch-aws

1 similar comment
@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

/test launch-aws

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM and happy green test buttons.

@haircommander
Copy link
Member

LGTM, I say let's get #3851 first

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

LGTM, I say let's get #3851 first

Sounds good.

@dirkmueller
Copy link

#3851 is in now I think. Anything else we want to wait on?

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

#3851 is in now I think. Anything else we want to wait on?

I think we’re fine.

@haircommander should I create the release+tag (via GitHub interface) on the latest release-1.18 commit if this one got merged? 😇 the automation should work then, but we need an official “GitHub release” to be able to upload the binaries automatically.

@haircommander
Copy link
Member

#3851 is in now I think. Anything else we want to wait on?

I think we’re fine.

@haircommander should I create the release+tag (via GitHub interface) on the latest release-1.18 commit if this one got merged? innocent the automation should work then, but we need an official “GitHub release” to be able to upload the binaries automatically.

are we not able to merge this, then tag the release?

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

#3851 is in now I think. Anything else we want to wait on?

I think we’re fine.
@haircommander should I create the release+tag (via GitHub interface) on the latest release-1.18 commit if this one got merged? innocent the automation should work then, but we need an official “GitHub release” to be able to upload the binaries automatically.

are we not able to merge this, then tag the release?

That's what I meant. Merge this one and then tag (but via a GitHub release, not via git tag ...) :) Would this work for you?

@haircommander
Copy link
Member

#3851 is in now I think. Anything else we want to wait on?

I think we’re fine.
@haircommander should I create the release+tag (via GitHub interface) on the latest release-1.18 commit if this one got merged? innocent the automation should work then, but we need an official “GitHub release” to be able to upload the binaries automatically.

are we not able to merge this, then tag the release?

That's what I meant. Merge this one and then tag (but via a GitHub release, not via git tag ...) :) Would this work for you?

works with me, can you take care of it?
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Jun 18, 2020
@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

/test critest_fedora

Yep.

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 7f261ae into cri-o:release-1.18 Jun 18, 2020
@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

@dirkmueller I’ll cut the release. Unfortunately I’m currently on vacation so I can’t update it in OBS. feel free to submit it there and ping @rhafer or @sysrich to accept it.

@saschagrunert saschagrunert deleted the 1.18.2 branch June 18, 2020 20:41
@dirkmueller
Copy link

@saschagrunert did so already, thanks a lot for your help during 'vacation' ;-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants