-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
[1.20] improve timeout handling and fix flakes #4430
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[1.20] improve timeout handling and fix flakes #4430
Conversation
| const sleepTimeBeforeCleanup = 1 * time.Minute | ||
|
|
||
| // ResourceStore is a structure that saves information about a recently created resource. | ||
| // Resources can be added and retrieved from the store. A retrieval (Get) also removes the Resource from the store. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a retrieval also removes? That's unusual no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suppose, though here we need to keep a single copy of the resource, so we're basically using move semantics. do you have a suggestion for a better method name?
|
/retest |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release-1.20 #4430 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 40.52% 40.59% +0.07%
================================================
Files 116 117 +1
Lines 9327 9404 +77
================================================
+ Hits 3780 3818 +38
- Misses 5120 5159 +39
Partials 427 427 |
|
/retest |
1 similar comment
|
/retest |
ResourceCache is a structure that keeps track of partially created Pods and Containers. Its features include: - tracking pods and containers after their initial creation times out - automatic garbage collection (after a timer) Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <[email protected]>
Before when a client's request for a RunPodSandbox or ContainerCreate timed out, CRI-O would clean up the resource. However, these requests usually fail when the node is under load. In these cases, it would be better to hold onto the progress, not get rid of it. This commit uses the previously created ResourceCache to cache the progress of a container creation and sandbox run. When a duplicate name is detected, before erroring, the server checks in the ResourceCache to see if we've already successfully created that resource. If so, we return it as if we'd just created it. It also moves the SetCreated call to after the resource is deemed as not having timed out. Hopefully, this reduces the load on already overloaded nodes. Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <[email protected]>
Even if we use the resource cache as is, the user is still bombarded with messages saying the name is reserved. This is bad UX, and we're capable of improving it. Add watcher idiom to resource cache, allowing a handler routine of RunPodSandbox or CreateContainer to wait for a resource to be available. Something that is key here is if the resource becomes available while we're watching for it, *we still need to error on this request* This is because we could get the resource from the cache, remove it (thus meaning it won't be cleaned up), and the kubelet's request could time out, and it could try again. This would cause us to leak a resource. This way, if we get into this situation, there needs to be three requests: first that times out second that discovers the resource is ready, but still errors third that actually retrives that resource and returns it. This will result in many fewer "name is reserved" errors (one every 2 seconds to one every 4 minutes) Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <[email protected]>
Now that we plan on caching the results of a pod sandbox creation, we shouldn't short circut the network creation. In a perfect world, we'd give the CNI plugin unbounded time, which would allow us to reuse even the longest of CNI creation time. However, this leads to the chance that the CNI plugin runs forever, which is not ideal. Instead, give the sandbox network creation 5 minutes (a minute more than the full request), to improve the odds we have a completed sandbox that can be reused, rather than thrown away. Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <[email protected]>
timeout.bats is a test suite that tests different scenerios regarding to timeouts in sandbox running and container creation. It requires a crictl that knows about the -T option Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <[email protected]>
Older version of this code used to have a goroutine for each resource, which is no longer the case, so remove the obsoleted part of the doc. It is already described elsewhere how the resource is becoming stale and removed. Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <[email protected]>
The 10s timeout is not enough sometimes to finish container or pod creation. Increase to 30s to fix occasional flakes, and move to a separate function wait_crio. While at it, - increate conmon sleep and crictl create/runp cancel timeout to 3s; - move create_conmon to setup; - fix ID checks (we're looking for string, not substring); - change a 3m timeout to 150s. Not critical, just nits. Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <[email protected]>
9968443 to
e3dc7e7
Compare
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: haircommander, mrunalp The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/lgtm |
|
/retest |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
carries #4394 and #4422
replaces #4421
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?