Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@wgahnagl
Copy link
Contributor

@wgahnagl wgahnagl commented Feb 10, 2021

What type of PR is this?

/kind api-change
/kind bug
/kind ci
/kind cleanup
/kind dependency-change
/kind deprecation
/kind design
/kind documentation
/kind failing-test
/kind feature
/kind flake
/kind other

What this PR does / why we need it:

backports session timeout fix from 1.21 to 1.18
#4529

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920300

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

allows session timeout to to be set as a config 

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. dco-signoff: no Indicates the PR's author has not DCO signed all their commits. labels Feb 10, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Hi @wgahnagl. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a cri-o member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Feb 10, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. and removed dco-signoff: no Indicates the PR's author has not DCO signed all their commits. labels Feb 10, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 10, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #4564 (6c59e83) into release-1.19 (6377f68) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 41.66%.

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##           release-1.19    #4564   +/-   ##
=============================================
  Coverage         40.87%   40.87%           
=============================================
  Files               114      114           
  Lines              8744     8756   +12     
=============================================
+ Hits               3574     3579    +5     
- Misses             4807     4814    +7     
  Partials            363      363           

@giuseppe
Copy link
Member

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 11, 2021
Copy link
Member

@giuseppe giuseppe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe, wgahnagl

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@wgahnagl
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@wgahnagl: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

Details

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@giuseppe
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Feb 11, 2021
@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM
once tests are righted.

@wgahnagl
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@wgahnagl
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@kolyshkin
Copy link
Collaborator

Will be helpful to provide links to original PRs/commits which are being backported in this PR description.

@wgahnagl
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

2 similar comments
@wgahnagl
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@relyt0925
Copy link

/retest

@haircommander
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 25, 2021
@haircommander
Copy link
Member

/retest

1 similar comment
@haircommander
Copy link
Member

/retest

@nee1esh
Copy link

nee1esh commented Feb 25, 2021

/test integration_crun

1 similar comment
@nee1esh
Copy link

nee1esh commented Feb 25, 2021

/test integration_crun

@kolyshkin
Copy link
Collaborator

/retest integration_crun

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@kolyshkin: The /retest command does not accept any targets.
The following commands are available to trigger jobs:

  • /test kata-containers
  • /test ami_fedora
  • /test ami_rhel
  • /test critest_fedora
  • /test critest_rhel
  • /test e2e_crun
  • /test e2e_cgroupv2
  • /test e2e_features_fedora
  • /test e2e_features_rhel
  • /test e2e_fedora
  • /test e2e_rhel
  • /test integration_crun
  • /test integration_cgroupv2
  • /test integration_fedora
  • /test integration_rhel
  • /test e2e-aws
  • /test images

Use /test all to run the following jobs:

  • kata-containers-crio-PR
  • test_pull_request_crio_critest_fedora
  • test_pull_request_crio_critest_rhel
  • test_pull_request_crio_e2e_crun_fedora
  • test_pull_request_crio_e2e_crun_fedora_cgroupv2
  • test_pull_request_crio_e2e_features_fedora
  • test_pull_request_crio_e2e_features_rhel
  • test_pull_request_crio_e2e_fedora
  • test_pull_request_crio_e2e_rhel
  • test_pull_request_crio_integration_crun_fedora
  • test_pull_request_crio_integration_crun_fedora_cgroupv2
  • test_pull_request_crio_integration_fedora
  • test_pull_request_crio_integration_rhel
  • pull-ci-cri-o-cri-o-release-1.19-e2e-aws
  • pull-ci-cri-o-cri-o-release-1.19-images
Details

In response to this:

/retest integration_crun

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kolyshkin
Copy link
Collaborator

/test integration_crun

@kolyshkin
Copy link
Collaborator

Circleci build is failing because go version packaged has a bug resulting in bunch of errors like this

golang.org/x/crypto/openpgp/packet.(*Compressed).parse: relocation target compress/zlib.NewReaderDict not defined
github.com/docker/spdystream/spdy.(*Framer).uncorkHeaderDecompressor: relocation target compress/zlib.NewReaderDict not defined
github.com/docker/spdystream/spdy.NewFramer: relocation target compress/zlib.NewWriterLevelDict not defined
github.com/docker/spdystream/spdy.(*Framer).writeSynStreamFrame: relocation target compress/zlib.(*Writer).Flush not defined
github.com/docker/spdystream/spdy.(*Framer).writeSynReplyFrame: relocation target compress/zlib.(*Writer).Flush not defined
github.com/docker/spdystream/spdy.(*Framer).writeHeadersFrame: relocation target compress/zlib.(*Writer).Flush not defined

This can be fixed by using golang installed from golang.org, but I see that @haircommander is moving away from circleci to GHA (see #4604) so I think fixing circleci is useless (for now).

Still looking into integration-crun

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 25, 2021

@wgahnagl: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/openshift-jenkins/integration_crun 6c59e83 link /test integration_crun

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@kolyshkin kolyshkin mentioned this pull request Feb 26, 2021
@kolyshkin
Copy link
Collaborator

Tried to repro integration_crun failure with more diagnostics at #4605, and it works (i.e. integration tests are passing -- there is still a problem of uploading the results back to prow, described at #4605 (comment)).

In here we have the same test failing (from https://prow.ci.openshift.org/log?job=test_pull_request_crio_integration_crun_fedora&id=1365076013226135552):

TASK [run integration tests] ***************************************************
task path: /go/src/github.com/cri-o/cri-o/contrib/test/integration/test.yml:21
fatal: [localhost]: FAILED! => {"ansible_job_id": "72200651440.24472", "changed": true, "cmd": "make localintegration >& /tmp/artifacts/testout.txt", "delta": "0:07:13.553467", "end": "2021-02-25 23:22:51.995499", "finished": 1, "msg": "non-zero return code", "rc": 2, "start": "2021-02-25 23:15:38.442032", "stderr": "", "stderr_lines": [], "stdout": "", "stdout_lines": []}

but as the detailed logs (testout) is not available, I can't say anything about what was wrong.

Which returns us back to the issue described at #4605 (comment)

@mrunalp mrunalp merged commit c90bfb8 into cri-o:release-1.19 Feb 26, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants