-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
[release-1.20] backports session timeout fix from 1.21 to 1.20 #4565
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-1.20] backports session timeout fix from 1.21 to 1.20 #4565
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Skyler Clark <[email protected]>
|
Hi @wgahnagl. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a cri-o member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release-1.20 #4565 +/- ##
=============================================
Coverage 40.62% 40.62%
=============================================
Files 117 117
Lines 9449 9461 +12
=============================================
+ Hits 3839 3844 +5
- Misses 5177 5184 +7
Partials 433 433 |
|
/ok-to-test |
|
/retest |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: haircommander, wgahnagl The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest |
1 similar comment
|
/retest |
Signed-off-by: Skyler Clark [email protected]
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
backports session timeout fix from 1.21 to 1.18
#4529
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920300
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?