Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@haircommander
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind api-change

/kind bug
/kind ci
/kind cleanup
/kind dependency-change
/kind deprecation
/kind design
/kind documentation
/kind failing-test
/kind feature
/kind flake
/kind other

What this PR does / why we need it:

as well as mark the feature as experimental

Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt [email protected]

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Update how the resources for a workload is specified. Now, to override a workload, the pod must have the annotation `$prefix/$ctr_name = {"$resource_type": "$resource_value"}`. The workloads feature has also been marked as experimental, which should have happened from the beginning.

as well as mark the feature as experimental

Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. labels Apr 21, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 21, 2021
@haircommander
Copy link
Member Author

refers to openshift/enhancements#741

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 21, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #4787 (87cb142) into master (8ab831e) will increase coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

❗ Current head 87cb142 differs from pull request most recent head b426dcf. Consider uploading reports for the commit b426dcf to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4787      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   43.02%   43.07%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         107      107              
  Lines        9773     9763      -10     
==========================================
  Hits         4205     4205              
+ Misses       5114     5104      -10     
  Partials      454      454              

Copy link
Member

@saschagrunert saschagrunert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@haircommander haircommander force-pushed the workload-settings-update branch from 215205a to b426dcf Compare April 22, 2021 21:03
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: haircommander, mrunalp, saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [haircommander,mrunalp,saschagrunert]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mrunalp
Copy link
Member

mrunalp commented Apr 23, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 23, 2021
@mrunalp
Copy link
Member

mrunalp commented Apr 23, 2021

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

7 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

16 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 24, 2021

@haircommander: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/openshift-jenkins/e2e_crun_cgroupv2 b426dcf link /test e2e_cgroupv2

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 40d6ec0 into cri-o:master Apr 24, 2021
@mrunalp
Copy link
Member

mrunalp commented Apr 26, 2021

/cherry-pick release-1.21

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@mrunalp: new pull request created: #4811

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.21

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants