-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
[1.20] oci: fix a performance regression from execs #5164
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <[email protected]>
to prevent excessive rss from being used in execs Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <[email protected]>
|
/retest |
saschagrunert
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: haircommander, saschagrunert The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
2 similar comments
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
turns out, starting a new inotify watcher for each exec probe was really inefficient. Replace it with one single watcher for all execs, which makes the RSS addition per exec much less (pretty much the overhead of exec.Cmd, which is unavoidable)
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Special notes for your reviewer:
cherry-pick of #5136
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?